121 Apple workers have until the end of January to choose.

I’m sure women will be stoked to have Apple relocate them to a state that could kill them.

  • Otter@lemmy.caEnglish
    142·
    11 months ago

    Google is dropping the Assistant team, and Amazon is dropping the Alexa team. This sounds a lot like Apple is trying to avoid an explicit layoff and forcing employees to quit instead.

    Constructive dismissal lawsuit?

    Edit: see this comment https://sopuli.xyz/comment/6157509

    • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      24·
      11 months ago

      Lawsuit of 100 people is laughable.

      Tech will never unionize, and because of that, are just shilling for billionaires so they can one day make it big. LMAO

      • namingthingsiseasy@programming.devEnglish
        22·
        11 months ago

        The reason why American tech workers haven’t unionized is because when times are good, they think they don’t need a union, and when times are bad, it’s far too late.

        Source: reading too many of hopeless comments like this on hacker news

        • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          5·
          11 months ago

          Nothing those employees can do, they’re even being offered money and time off to move lol.

          Legally, 0 actionable items for a suit.

            • hedgehog@ttrpg.networkEnglish
              7·
              11 months ago

              Constructive dismissal isn’t illegal, it merely allows the employees to receive benefits and make claims as though they had been dismissed. California is an at-will employment state, so unless these employees have contracts stating otherwise (including the employee handbook, unless it has verbiage stating it is not legally binding), their dismissal is legal.

              Apple is giving each employee who chooses to resign a $12.5k severance package. Assuming Apple doesn’t plan on fighting any unemployment claims made by these employees, what else you think they would be able to get after a successful lawsuit?

            • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              11 months ago

              I don’t understand what kind of magic bullet people think a constructive discharge lawsuit is or what kind of powerful uno reverse card it would be. Winning a constructive discharge lawsuit is basically being legally fired instead of quiting…they’d probably get less from that lawsuit (not even counting the time and legal fees) than if they just accepted Apples package. What is a constructive discharge lawsuit supposed to do here?

            • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
              1·
              11 months ago

              I agree, but I don’t think that’s even close to a reasonable reason to sue.

              I don’t like that, but I’m just making the argument that the 1% doesn’t give 2 shits either way.

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      15·
      11 months ago

      Not constructive dismissal, because the goal isn’t to place the burden on the employee. On whatever date, they will all be terminated without cause (layoff) if they choose not to relocate. There is no goal of forcing them to quit. Presumably, Apple has filed (or will file in due time) things like the WARN Act notification.

      This is a PR move to hide the layoffs from the general public, but not from the law.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      4·
      11 months ago

      Huh. So they’re all dropping their voice assistant teams. Is this because it turns out people only ever use them as voice activated kitchen timers because it turns out talking to computers sucks, or is some worse generative AI shit coming?

    • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      11 months ago

      What seems to be going down is that tech firms are laying off AI teams that aren’t based on large LLMs like ChatGPT. My read: they’re thinking it’s time to lay off those workers in anticipation of replacing that functionality (in siri, cortana, echo/alexa) with a large LLM stack