• cerement@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    8 months ago

    the irony is that we wouldn’t need to sacrifice much (if at all) for those benefits – in other words, you could be completely selfish and still have a better life

    • US is sitting at 28 vacant homes per homeless person (city of Helsinki saved the country of Finland €15000 per person per year just by buying them a house)
    • healthcare for all (and better quality) would cost us about 2/3 what we’re paying now
    • we produce (and have) plenty of food for everyone but companies would rather throw it away if they can’t make a profit (John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath)
    • better public transit means more convenience for everyone with the added benefits of better air quality, nicer neighborhoods, less wear-and-tear on infrastructure, cheaper commuting – !fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
    • Kallioapina@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      On the Finnish homelesness part: you’re spouting misinfo, knowingly or unknowingly. Our system doesnt buy houses or apartments to anyone.

      Every homeless person though IS offered a flat in a socially subsidized, very cheap price as part of a social program and/or place in a substance abuse coliving program-type of thing (not sure on the spesifics of those).

      Its weird how there’s so much misinformation about Finland in Lemmy these days, like were some magical egelitarian happy-land. No, we just pay our taxes and have built up a social security net, though thats actively being dismantled by our right wing government these days.

      Source of all of this: I am a finn.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Ελληνικά
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      US is sitting at 28 vacant homes per homeless person

      This pisses me off so much. There should be an extra tax for unfilled housing.

    • Rookwood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, everyone having a better quality of life would elevate everyone who isn’t wealthy enough to isolate into a fenced off estate and has servants to do all their domestic tasks.