The administrators of the DDoSecrets website write that they have run out of money for funding. If they don’t raise $150,000 by January 31, 2024, they might be forced to suspend operations. This is written on the red banner that appears when you go to the site.

Info: Distributed Denial of Secrets (DDoSecrets) is a journalist 501©(3) non-profit publishing and archiving leaks, and devoted to the free transmission of data in the public interest.

In more detail (from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_Denial_of_Secrets):

Distributed Denial of Secrets, abbreviated DDoSecrets, is a non-profit whistleblower site founded in 2018 for news leaks. The site is a frequent source for other news outlets and has worked on investigations including Cyprus Confidential with other media organizations. In December 2023, the organization said it had published over 100 million files from 59 countries.

Sometimes referred to as a successor to WikiLeaks, it came to international attention for its June 2020 publication of internal police documents, known as BlueLeaks. The group has also published data on Russian oligarchs, fascist groups, shell companies, tax havens and banking in the Cayman Islands, as well as data scraped from Parler in January 2021 and from the February 2021 Gab leak. The group is also known for publishing emails from military officials, City Hall in Chicago and the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police Department.

The site’s leaks have resulted in or contributed to multiple government investigations, including the second impeachment of President Donald J. Trump. During the Russo-Ukrainian War, they were considered one of the best public repositories of all the Russian files leaked since the invasion began.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It doesn’t matter if they HAD the RNC emails or not

      It doesn’t matter if they HAD the RNC emails or not

      It doesn’t matter if they HAD the RNC emails or not

      You can’t be this obtuse, right?

      They can’t produce info on the RNC they don’t have. So because they couldn’t release info on both parties, it’s unfair and illegal, is that what you’re saying? That it’s only valid for them to leak on the DNC if they can do the same to the RNC? Because that’s bonkers stupid and you need to live in the real world. We don’t hide information because we need it to be “equal for both sides.”

      Literally, would you argue the same if they leaked the RNC emails but not the DNC emails???

      Dude, get a grip. You’re lost in the fucking sauce.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Again, why would they only go after the DNC during an election year that it’s been proven that Russians had an interest in and were interfering with? My last question that I’m sure you’ll avoid.

        • Snot Flickerman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          If you don’t see yourself as subscribing to a conspiracy theory because you’ve decided that since they didn’t out the RNC it must mean they’re working for Russia, while ignoring the mountains of evidence Wikileaks leaked on the Bush admin, I don’t know what to tell you, other than you need your head checked.

          That’s literally fantasy-land, mate. Without evidence, you’re literally just making shit up and are just as bad as the people you claim to hate.

          Was Clinton working for Russia? It was her campaign strategy to elevate Donald Trump because she thought he would be easy to beat.

          https://www.salon.com/2016/11/09/the-hillary-clinton-campaign-intentionally-created-donald-trump-with-its-pied-piper-strategy/