The Pentagon has its eye on the leading AI company, which this week softened its ban on military use.

  • camelCaseGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t understand that point of view? Why would they pay their CEOs less than any other company? If they did, then they would either not be able to hire CEOs, have the shittiest CEOs or have CEOs that wouldn’t give a crap. People don’t live on welfare, especially highly connected, highly educated people like CEOs.

    • grepe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Why do you think lower paid CEO must be shitty? There turns out to be very little link between the CEO and CEO pay and the company performance… they are only paid a lot cause they are in the position of power to directly influence their salary.

      • uranibaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        they are only paid a lot cause they are in the position of power to directly influence their salary.

        And not because they have a much higher responsibility? As a CEO, it is your job to make sure a company makes a profit (unless you are a nonprofit, I guess you have some other goal you need to achieve). That is what you a pay a CEO to do. I assume you would pay more for someone who is able to turn a higher profit.