Two authors sued OpenAI, accusing the company of violating copyright law. They say OpenAI used their work to train ChatGPT without their consent.

  • trial_and_err@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Have your tried instructing ChatGPT?

    I’ve tried:

    “Act as an e book reader. Start with the first page of Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone”

    The first pages checked out at least. I just tried again, but the prompts are returned extremely slow at the moment so I can’t check it again right now. It appears to stop after the heading, that definitely wasn’t the case before, I was able to browse pages.

    It may be a statistical model, but ultimately nothing prevents that model from overfitting, i.e. memoizing its training data.

    • ThoughtGoblin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use it all day at my job now. Ironically, on a specialization more likely to overfit.

      It may be a statistical model, but ultimately nothing prevents that model from overfitting, i.e. memoizing its training data.

      This seems to imply that not only did entire books accidentally get downloaded, slip past the automated copyright checker, but that it happened so often that the AI saw the same so many times it overwhelmed other content and baked, without error and at great opportunity cost, an entire book into it. And that it was rewarded for doing so.

    • McArthur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait… isn’t that the correct response though? I mean if i ask an ai to produce something copyright infringing it should, for example reproducing Harry potter. The issue is when is asked to produce something new, (e.g. a story about wizards living secretly in the modern world) does it infringe on copyright without telling you? This is certainly a harder question to answer.

      • ffhein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think they’re seeing this as a traditional copyright infringement issue, i.e. they don’t want anyone to be able to make copies of their work intentionally either.