I think your missing some key bits of information here.
I agree the original reply didn’t put it well but the reason for the logic used to say we are fine is:
A: They use ice that came loose as a result global warming and was going to get lost, so in a way this is recycling the collateral damage rather then letting it perish
B: know those cowboyfilms featuring big blocks of ice? There used to be a huge market for natural ice as we couldn’t make more. But the novelty of natural ice in 24? they are unlikely to become more then a niche market rather then a global new ice trade.
Resulting in a : Can’t be much worse then when there was an actueel frozen-movie-style ice trade.
My opinion is irrelevant, wether you agree is yours to decide but the comment that originally replied does make a proper if not debatable argument.
If you want to debate it though, reply to them instead i am just a friendly bypasser.
I think your missing some key bits of information here.
I agree the original reply didn’t put it well but the reason for the logic used to say we are fine is:
A: They use ice that came loose as a result global warming and was going to get lost, so in a way this is recycling the collateral damage rather then letting it perish
B: know those cowboyfilms featuring big blocks of ice? There used to be a huge market for natural ice as we couldn’t make more. But the novelty of natural ice in 24? they are unlikely to become more then a niche market rather then a global new ice trade.
Resulting in a : Can’t be much worse then when there was an actueel frozen-movie-style ice trade.
My opinion is irrelevant, wether you agree is yours to decide but the comment that originally replied does make a proper if not debatable argument.
If you want to debate it though, reply to them instead i am just a friendly bypasser.