ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to The Onion@midwest.socialEnglish · 11 months agoExperts: No Way to Truly Know if Redditor You're Arguing With Is Bot or Childhard-drive.netexternal-linkmessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1732
arrow-up1732external-linkExperts: No Way to Truly Know if Redditor You're Arguing With Is Bot or Childhard-drive.netZeroCool@slrpnk.net to The Onion@midwest.socialEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square86fedilink
minus-squarePossible_EmuWrangler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·11 months agoI wonder what Alan Turing would think of this.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·11 months agoHe’d be too busy shitposting on Tumblr as King of the Gay Pirates
minus-squareWhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·11 months agoGay Pirates have no king. Gay Pirates need no king.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 months agoGay Pirates not only have a king, but need a king, because the writer is a monarchist
minus-squareImplyingImplications@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·11 months agoLet me ask the Alan Turing chatbot…
minus-squaretryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoAny AI smart enough to pass a turing test would also be smart enough to fail it on purpose.
I wonder what Alan Turing would think of this.
He’d be too busy shitposting on Tumblr as King of the Gay Pirates
Gay Pirates have no king. Gay Pirates need no king.
Gay Pirates not only have a king, but need a king, because the writer is a monarchist
Let me ask the Alan Turing chatbot…
Any AI smart enough to pass a turing test would also be smart enough to fail it on purpose.