• Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I didn’t say it means it’s wrong, just that it’s not going to be an accurate picture. It might be right, it might be wrong, we have no idea - which is why they put that qualifier there.

    There’s nothing indicating twitter isn’t still largely stable.

    Also that’s not a DDOS since there was no denial of service. Those calls are likely all just getting stopped at a cloudflare (or alternative) level anyway.

    • HeavyDogFeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There was no denial of service because they rate limited accounts. That’s the entire point. Had they not done that, it’s likely they would have overwhelmed their servers and crashed the service, resulting in denial of service.

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But no one knows when that repeated call was added to twitter - it could have been there for years. Like I said, it also likely just gets caught by cloudflare etc when it’s doing that, meaning it’s not going to overwhelm anything.

        You’re saying that they did a release, realised it was going to DDOS itself, so then rate limited accounts in another release rather than simply roll back the broken release or fix the call? That doesn’t make any sense.

        • HeavyDogFeet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They didn’t realise it was going to DDOS itself, it was in the process of hammering their servers and they rate limited accounts because they didn’t know what was happening. It was still making excessive calls when they were rate limiting.

          It makes no sense because the things they’re doing aren’t the actions of a competent team with a knowledgeable tech lead.

          I think I’ve made my point pretty clear by now. If you’d still like to believe they’re not useless, go for gold, but the facts doesn’t support that.

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s 100% guessing based on nothing more than your wild speculation. You have no facts to support it.

              • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not the one making claims, you are. You’ve got nothing to support those claims.

                As a developer myself I’m 99.9% sure what you’re claiming didn’t happen because it makes no sense from a dev standpoint.