The former president files several fresh motions to toss out Fulton County election interference charges

Attorneys for Donald Trump claim that the former president didn’t have “fair notice” that his attempts to reverse his Georgia loss in the 2020 presidential election could result in criminal charges against him.

A flurry of filings in Fulton County Superior Court on Monday argue that the sprawling election interference case against Mr Trump “consists entirely of core political speech at the zenith of First Amendment protections”.

Attorneys for the former president want the case dismissed on grounds that he has “presidential immunity” from actions while in office, that he was already acquitted for similar allegations in his second impeachment trial, and that he was never told that what he was doing in the state – where he is charged as part of an alleged racketeering scheme to unlawfully subvert the state’s election results – could be prosecuted.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      84
      ·
      10 months ago

      It worked for Jr. Apparently he was too stupid to collude with Russia, despite his best efforts.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          10 months ago

          The next trump legal argument: “yer honor I’m literally too dumb to commit crimes”

          • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I wonder if being found incompetent to stand trail would have any effect on what he did as president. Like would they just invalidate anything he signed?

    • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ignorance of the law is no excuse

      Unless you’re a cop illegally detaining someone for breaking a non-existent law

    • SuperTulle
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      And hasn’t been since before the Roman empire, possibly longer.

      Ignorantia juris non excusat