• Croquette@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    10 months ago

    Artists are getting replaced by machines, just like when blacksmiths were getting replaced by machines.

    People are losing their livelihood, so the backlash is normal and to be expected.

    I think that in your case, considering the context around AI, you should use it and be transparent about it. Some people will be mad, but what can you do?

    • iegod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Transparent about what? I’m not going around listing all the tools used to create my game, use of an LLM for image generation should be no different. If I get asked, sure I’ll talk about it, but I’m not going out to announce it.

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        The use of LLM is different because it is a new disruptive technology that has not been properly accepted by society and does not have the proper laws yet. People are losing their livelihood over it, so it is not like using free assets on unity marketplace.

        Considering all the debates and lawsuits around LLM using copyrighted work to train their data on, you could put in your listing that assets were generated with LLM. You are transparent from the get go, the people that will be mad will get mad, but at least it will be upfront.

        If you don’t announce that you used LLM and people figure out that you used LLM assets, the backlash risk being greater than announcing upfront that you generated assets with a LLM.

      • セリャスト
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        An LLM does not gemerate images, but text. You probably meant image generation model