• ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    9 months ago

    So I wonder what degree of slavery we’d have ended up with? A little? Almost as much? 50% slavery?

    What a fucking idiot.

    • purplepuppy@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      Slavery is already legal in US if you arrest a person first. That is an exception of the 13th amendment,

      I assume that is why US has the biggest prison population in the World and is 6th country in the World by per capita incarceration rate (first western country). If China and India would incarcerate it’s citizens as much as US, China would have 4 times and India 10 times it’s current prison population. And of course white people are about 8 times less likely to be incarcerated then black people.

      “Land of the free”

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Jesus, I thought that back guy was wearing a Confederate flag hat for a second…

      • ExLisper@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I always wonder how did this exception end up there. From what I checked it’s not clear who proposed it. I just imagine that after fighting extremely bloody and devastating war over it they sat down to draft the amendments and someone went “Are we sure we want to ban all slavery?”. It’s crazy that they decided to keep it only giving courts authority over it.

        • purplepuppy@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          People who write laws benefit from slavery and having lower economic classes. It was never their true intention to get rid of slavery, but only to calm the citizens that are rebeling against it. Overtime they figured smarter ways of slavery. Free slaves > but because of private property they now dont own anything still > they have to take any job under any working conditions > back to slaves again. If some escape this wage slavery, by not working or something, they make up a reason to arrest them, like vagrancy (illegal to be unemployed or homeless) or for not paying your debts or for some stupid reasons as drugs (planted by cops or not) or even dumber for resisting arrest even if there was nothing to be arrested for in the first place.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      The funny thing is that Lincoln pretty much said they could keep their slaves for the sake of keeping the union together. He had made it clear he wanted to abolish slavery, but he wasn’t going to risk the nation over it. He basically opened with an offer to let the south have everything.

      The South, however, believed that the day would come where the US would abolish slavery, and they needed to get out before that happened.

      Given the South were handed everything they wanted in the default position, no amount of negotiation would have worked.

      • Red_October@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        So what you’re saying is, Trump was Wrong? Holy shit someone needs to tell the Press! Word needs to get out that Trump was wrong about a thing! Nobody will believe it!

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I suppose Trump was right… The south could have easily negotiated to get what they wanted. So while the free states could not have negotiated, the slave states absolutely could have. They were just pissy that too many new states were choosing to be free states and they were outnumbered and wanted a country where they weren’t outnumbered on slavery.