we need teleportation frankly

  • berg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s quite the question to ask, but as far I can tell it only works with quantum information. Sending a body would be like you trying to fit into a fiber cable to be bounced inside of beneath the Atlantic to avoid the otherwise long flight.

      • berg@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        … if we could figure out scanning and printing at the atomic scale, with zero defects

        I think this is a bigger issue currently than sending large amounts of data across the globe. Though I wonder how much data a full copy would demand.

          • papalonian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was getting incredibly confused because the copy/paste didn’t copy the superscript for the exponents. I was like, “there’s definitely more than 1027 atoms in the body… wait, how are there supposedly only 1021 bytes of storage in the whole world? Oooh…”

          • Xariphon@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Now I’m wondering how long it would realistically take for that to become a not-insane demand. I know data storage multiplies pretty rapidly, but not that rapidly, so are we talking decades or centuries?

      • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Quantum “teleportation” is not capable of sending information FTL. Quantum entanglement means that the wave functions of two or more particles (in essence, the information possessed by the particles) are correlated, but the information must be encoded by a device at the midpoint between the two observers and sent to the observers at a speed not exceeding the speed of light.