• Frostbeard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s how you tax. Some Norwegians left because not the income but the fortune was taxed. And by fortune also the value of stocks and such. The issue for some was they needed to sell off stocks to pay the tax. Also Norway established a new tax that tax the fortune if you leave. I am ALL for taxing the wealthy, but if the money has already been taxed…

    • DrFuggles@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s already been taxed, yes, but it’s also passively generating income by investing it. You tax that income with a capital gains tax.

      You can further impose a let’s say 1-2% tax on wealth above let’s say 5 million, so you only have to pay 1% on 2M if you are worth 7M.

      That should be easily covered by your investing gains if you play at that level. So, in essence, no harm done to personal wealth. You just get richer less fast while urgent social and infrastructure projects receive better funding.

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean, if the point is to stop people from stockpiling wealth and increasing wealth disparity, then it sounds pretty effective.