Krafting@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoPoints were madelemmy.worldimagemessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up1241
arrow-up1241imagePoints were madelemmy.worldKrafting@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareAstrealix@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up37·1 year agoObjection: the set of sets is not a set. This is a different level of binary, therefore making you simultaneously binary and non-binary depending on perspective.
minus-squareNiHaDuncan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up31·1 year agoIf the set of sets is not a set then why did you just define it as a set? Checkmate.
minus-squaredevortex@lemmy.fmhy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI really wanted to reply “checkmate” but you already added it yourself. So instead I posted this. You’re welcome internet!
Objection: the set of sets is not a set. This is a different level of binary, therefore making you simultaneously binary and non-binary depending on perspective.
If the set of sets is not a set then why did you just define it as a set? Checkmate.
I really wanted to reply “checkmate” but you already added it yourself. So instead I posted this. You’re welcome internet!
That’ll Russell some feathers