List could be released as soon as Tuesday after deadline for objections to unsealing of names passes midnight Monday

Nearly 200 names connected to the Jeffrey Epstein-Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking conspiracy could be released by a New York judge as soon as Tuesday, exposing or confirming the identities of dozens of associates of the disgraced financier that until now have only been known as John and Jane Does in court papers.

A deadline for objections to the unsealing of the names passes at midnight on Monday, nearly nine years after victim Virginia Giuffre filed a single defamation claim against Maxwell, daughter of the late British press baron Robert Maxwell, in 2015, that in turn produced the names in legal depositions.

A year later, in 2016, US district court judge Robert Sweet rejected Maxwell’s motion to dismiss the case, finding that “the veracity of a contextual world of facts more broad than the allegedly defamatory statements” and that Guiffre “was a victim of sustained underage sexual abuse between 1999 and 2002”. The parties settled out of court in 2017.

  • Kushan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 months ago

    Bill gates has publicly spoken about his meetings with Epstein, that’s well known and public knowledge at this point.

    I believe what’s being asked for is more concrete information on why Melinda left Bill Gates and if Epstein had anything to do with it.

    • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I couldn’t find anything regarding that but I wasn’t exactly trying very hard into sprawling the internet for it so it could be out there if you put any more effort than a quick search

      • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Might need to update your search skills/sources/settings, I literally searched “Melinda Gates Epstein” and this was the first result. Kinda feels wrong even calling it a “quick search” given how little effort it took… Hell, you coulda clicked through on the first Newsweek article you posted and found the interview.