schalkneethling@programming.dev to Programming@programming.dev · 1 year agoGit Thingsmatklad.github.ioexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up136cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansgit@programming.devhackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up136external-linkGit Thingsmatklad.github.ioschalkneethling@programming.dev to Programming@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansgit@programming.devhackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareFal@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoSquash fast forward merge is the only way
minus-squarethemusicman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoQuite the opposite. If you fast forward merge without squashing, you lose the ability to meaningfully bisect, since only the head of each merge is checked by CI - other commits may not even build
Removed by mod
Squash fast forward merge is the only way
Quite the opposite. If you fast forward merge without squashing, you lose the ability to meaningfully bisect, since only the head of each merge is checked by CI - other commits may not even build
Removed by mod