Picture Pig@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 1 year agoLet's go! (sorry i used WSL i have my own reasons for it...)lemmy.worldimagemessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1184
arrow-up1184imageLet's go! (sorry i used WSL i have my own reasons for it...)lemmy.worldPicture Pig@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squaregornius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoBetter in which way? WSL2 is a VM running ALONGSIDE Windows, not inside. Its performance is basically bare metal. If you have enough RAM, there is no reason to use cygwin instead of WSL2.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoIn that case why don’t you just run a VM or install bare metal. WSL strips you of control just like Windows itself does.
minus-squarePicture Pig@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoits complicated as i replied to someone else’s comment… im not a “it just works” user too but its complicated to explain why i use windows for now (but ill switich soon) like im totally a FOSS enthusiast but like…
minus-squarePicture Pig@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoits complicated please dont blame me for WSL
Better in which way? WSL2 is a VM running ALONGSIDE Windows, not inside. Its performance is basically bare metal. If you have enough RAM, there is no reason to use cygwin instead of WSL2.
In that case why don’t you just run a VM or install bare metal. WSL strips you of control just like Windows itself does.
its complicated as i replied to someone else’s comment…
im not a “it just works” user too but its complicated to explain why i use windows for now (but ill switich soon)
like im totally a FOSS enthusiast but like…
its complicated please dont blame me for WSL