• SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    9 months ago

    Here’s how I interpret their reactions:

    Conservatives tend to have much larger amygdalas, which makes sense, as their worldview is based around fear. The brain/ amygdala treats threats to personal identity with the same fear response as physical threats.

    A 15-minute city means you don’t need a car, and it’s far less convenient to have one. But for a lot of people, especially the conservative folks, their car (or bro-dozer) is their identity, or at least a huge part of it. Their identity is fragile enough already, it can’t withstand removing a big chunk of it. (How would a man know he’s a man without a truck to perform masculinity in?)

    Therefore, a walkable city is s threat to their vehicle, which is a threat to their identity, which is just as frightening as a physical threat, like being hunted for sport.

  • RiderExMachina@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    9 months ago

    I wish I could find it and share the actual quote, but someone on Twitter (iirc) posted something like, “the best way to approach urbanism and biking to conservatives is to say ‘I’m for traditional neighborhoods that use independent transportation methods without government overreach’ or ‘I want fiscally responsible transportation methods’.”

    To no one’s surprise, these refer to walkable cities, using walking or biking, and include buses with the second quote.

      • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        At least the appropriated buzzwords are used correctly. We’re not twisting words like hearing “affordable healthcare” and using an ingrained Rush Limbaugh decoder to hear “death panels”. We’re just preserving the poison that was already in their buzzwords.

        Limbaugh’s gone, but the playbook is the same.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      “the best way to approach urbanism and biking to conservatives is to say ‘I’m for traditional neighborhoods that use independent transportation methods without government overreach’ or ‘I want fiscally responsible transportation methods’.”

      I mean, sure. And that might stick for a conversation or a few days. But come back in a week, after their ears have been pumped with Agenda 21 China Takeover Shari Law Communist Prison State talk radio gibberish. You’ll be right back to square one.

      At some point, it isn’t the quality of message but the quantity. If you want to trick your Evangelical Homophobic Constitution Party voting uncle into supporting 15 minute cities, you need to configure his AM radio to play Well There’s Your Problem podcast episodes in place of whatever crap Clear Channel is transmitting.

      • RiderExMachina@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well there’s our problem. There’s no way you’d get my Evangelical Homophobic Constitution Party voting uncle to even listen to There’s Your Problem because within the first two minutes they’ll say “So the problem is Capitalism,” and he’d go back to Limbaugh reruns.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          The first two minutes of any WTYP episode is Rocz or Liam fighting with the recording interface, to comic effect.

          And I think that’s one of the selling points of a lot of these indie leftist shows. They’re entertaining in a way the old grouchy wingers aren’t. Admittedly, it’s very Millennial/Zoomers humor. So maybe Alice joking about bombing the local golf course isn’t going to be Uncle’s speed.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Is Well There’s Your Problem very leftist?

          YMMV. The crew feels like the left-most fringe of /r/neoliberal if you aged them 20 years, gave a few of them actual experience in civil/architectural engineering rather than just State Uni B-school, and shaved off the knee-jerk hatred of Bernie Sanders / Jeremy Corbyn.

          I got more of a politically uninvolved vibe, so I got bored

          They tend to be more on the technical side of the FALGSC spectrum, so you get less “this is the politician/union leader who you should be organizing with” and more “this is the highly technical reason why you shouldn’t let your nation’s largest failson administer the construction of a transcontinental railway”.

          I enjoy it because I’m genuinely interested in the science/engineering/math behind a lot of these industrial scale failures. It is cathartic, particularly when I’m grinding through my own workplace engineering/accounting crisis of the day.

    • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      This but not sarcastically. I’m politically conservative, and for the same reasons that I’m an environmental conservationist. Framing things in a way that makes sense to the listener is just good messaging.

    • aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Libs (and a lot of leftists) are always looking for the magical incantation. The thing they can utter that will make conservatives realize how ignorant their views are. It’s at once a cynical and cruel belief (that conservatives are sub-human) and completely naive. Convincing conservatives they are wrong is often impossible, but there are two ways to do it when it is possible. 1) spend a long time in honest and empathetic interaction, and 2) take power and show them. The second way is exemplified by the ACA (despite its many flaws): conservatives threw an absolute tantrum and made it extremely unpopular. Democrats passed it, and now it’s popular to the point that Republicans couldn’t repeal it despite campaigning on it for 7 years.

  • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I recently moved to an apartment with decent walkability to basic neccesties and I feel far more free than a car has ever made me feel.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I hope so.

          EDIT: Wikipedia says: “He is the co-author of the New York Times bestseller The Party’s Over: How the Extreme Right Hijacked the GOP and I Became a Democrat.” So basically an ‘enlightened centrist.’ Better than before, I guess.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              9 months ago

              Imagine thinking becoming a Democrat because Republicans went too far right actually makes you a centrist.

              America has two parties. A right-wing party and a far-right wing party.

              • SpookyUnderwear@eviltoast.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Or, now hear me out, you don’t have to align with either of the two major American political parties. You don’t have to support either. What either party does or does not do has no bearing on my views on a subject.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  When did I say what he or you had to do?

                  If you don’t like being criticized for your political position, keep it hidden and don’t get butthurt when people criticize someone else’s.

                  Neither you nor he are granted a special dispensation to be free from criticism, sorry.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Being centrist inherently means trying to hold two opinions that don’t jive together. Say someone likes lower taxes, but also says health care will be publicly funded. We would need higher taxes on that system–which would be less money out of your pocket over time–and something needs to give.

              Then there are issues where there is no center position. Like getting into a war or not.

              • SpookyUnderwear@eviltoast.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                You’re entitled to your opinion. It’s wrong, but you’re entitled to it. Centrists have views all across the political spectrum. One can support abortion rights while supporting the 2nd amendment. One can support smaller government (in a individuals life) while supporting more regulations for corporations.

                • frezik@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  One can support abortion rights while supporting the 2nd amendment

                  There’s leftist groups that agree. That’s not inherently centrist.

                  One can support smaller government (in a individuals life) while supporting more regulations for corporations.

                  Which of these positions do you consider left or right? Because if you’re confusing Democrats with leftists, I can see how you think this is centrist.

    • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      9 months ago

      Many Americans are already dealing with the downsides of urban density but without the benefits of a walkable city.

    • bigboig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think of it like getting better public transport. Even if you don’t use it, other people will and that will give you more space

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      In Houston, during the 60s, you could drive out into the wilderness once you passed 610.

      But with urban sprawl all the way out to Conroe, Katy, and Rosenberg, what used to be a 15 minute drive has turned into hours in the car to escape the edge of the city.

      Every new subdivision pushed the rural neighborhoods farther and farther away.

    • nifty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I feel the same way, I don’t mind people but in small, small, smaaaaaall doses. But cities like that are great for others, I don’t have to live there.

      • RiderExMachina@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 months ago

        Y’all might be imagining NYC levels of density and, while that’s important, is definitely several steps further than what’s needed to make America not terrible. Something like rowhouses or even 4-plexes would be an improvement, and that would, at max, only add 50-100 more people to the average city block.

        If you already live in a neighborhood, you would really only be interacting with your neighbors as you do now. It’s not as if your entire city is going to be in the same 15 minute stretch.

        • nifty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’d like that for other people! I don’t think it’s bad if some land is less dense though? I can’t stand living in anything that has connecting walls with another house. People are loud, they don’t respect each others spaces or things, and they get super entitled to using common spaces and not sharing with others. People with children are especially bad at all this. But eh, maybe my experience has just been bad.

          • Ashelyn
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            I mean, the whole crux of the issue right now is that it’s illegal to build “missing middle” multi-family homes due to zoning in most of the US–it’s almost entirely either single family homes or apartment blocks, two extremes with nothing in between.

            It’s fine if some of the land is less dense, if you don’t like dealing with other people fixing this issue would be a good thing for you too! Imagine if all the people who preferred the option of a house with 2-4 units and its own yard were afforded that option; 100-300% density increases would free up so much of the land that’s mostly chemically treated lawns and unnecessarily wide roads, not to mention even more rural areas farther out. I think it would do a lot to help the housing cost crisis even if nothing else were accomplished alongside it legislatively.

          • brb@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            People are loud

            This is a problem with soundproofing. I didn’t know I had neighbors until I saw one guy leave his apartment

            super entitled to using common spaces

            Not sure what spaces you are talking about. The only common space I have is sauna, and that is optional

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            The solution to sound is building the walls better with sound proofing. This only happens because houses are built with so many corners cut.

        • themelm@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Plus you can still just put headphones in and quickly dash home to lock yourself away just like now. And I’m sure you’ll still be able to get people to deliver things to you even if those people are on foot or bike.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      In a weird way the higher density is actually liberating because it gives you cover for just ignoring everyone. It’s a cognitive trick which takes a bit of practice, but eventually there is a strange solace in urban life.

      I lived in suburbs and a small town for about half my life and those places get smaller the longer you are there. You run into someone you know whenever you go out, and people are always waving or saying hi because they think that’s just being friendly. In the city nobody is going to say hi or wave at 3000 people per day. And nobody get labeled rude or antisocial for it.

  • verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Sea Lab 2021. I need my Happy Cake Oven. This thread has gotten so serious, I need my Cousteau analogue to dive down and grab one for all of us, it’s way too Hazel Murphy in here. Translation: let’s stop masturbating about what’s wrong with somebody else’s amygdala and lighten up. None of us are smart enough to have a food handler’s license, let alone a medical degree.