• Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    The correct response to being reminded that anecdotes aren’t data isn’t trying to do more math on your anecdata.

    Actual studies measure these rates. Your limited knowledge of your extended acquaintance group means jack shit for whether they’re correct. I only know of a single person in my extended acquaintances who had heart disease. It doesn’t mean that general population statistics on heart disease are wrong, it means some combination of I’m missing information and my sample is biased. Your sample is not random (so multiplying a statistic of the general population against them is not valid) and you don’t actually know who’s experienced long COVID symptoms. Some may have had some and gotten better, some may not even recognize a lingering cough or being more worn out as a symptom, and some may just not feel like it’s necessary to tell you.

    • droog_the_droog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Absolutely. Always consider medical statistics based on self reporting with a grain of salt is all I’m saying. Obviously, my back of a napkin maths based on my personal circumstances shouldn’t be used as any kind of evidence on your behalf. This is also why I say it’s based on my own anecdotes.