House Bill 2127 pre-empts municipalities from enacting legislation in eight areas—with predictable results.

  • MasterOBee Master/King@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    In what way? To have consistent laws for sub contractors across the state? I promise you, on site, when people are thirsty they get their drink of water.

      • MasterOBee Master/King@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Let me guess, you saw a headline, and have absolutely 0 knowledge of the industry, but you’re acting as if you’ve worked construction in 100 degree weather?

        Once you talk to people who have done that, or better yet, done it yourself, you’d understand that we don’t care about local policies ‘mandating’ water breaks. We drink water perpetually throughout the day.

        Edit: Lol downvotes from people who have never worked construction in 100 degree weather telling someone who has how we drink water. I was hoping this wouldn’t just be another r/politics sub, but it appears I was wrong.

        • shottymcb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Once you talk to people who have done that, or better yet, done it yourself, you’d understand that we don’t care about local policies ‘mandating’ water breaks. We drink water perpetually throughout the day.

          Then what is your grievance with requiring it?

          • MasterOBee Master/King@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why do we need government requiring me to drink water?

            Waste of government time, tax payer dollars, administration costs all so some politician can pat themselves on their back.

            How would you like it if I walked into your office and dictated your time?