https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

Many of us do not trust Facebook and anything it is associated with or swallows up.

EDIT:

https://techcrunch.com/2023/07/05/adam-mosseri-says-metas-threads-app-wont-have-activitypub-support-at-launch/

"Instagram head Adam Mosseri said "

““Soon, you’ll be able to follow and interact with people on other fediverse platforms, such as Mastodon. They can also find people on Threads using full usernames, such as @mosseri@threads.net.””

“We’re committed to building support for ActivityPub, the protocol behind Mastodon, into this app. We weren’t able to finish it for launch given a number of complications that come along with a decentralized network, but it’s coming,” he said.

“If you’re wondering why this matters, here’s a reason: you may one day end up leaving Threads, or, hopefully not, end up de-platformed. If that ever happens, you should be able to take your audience with you to another server. Being open can enable that.”

  • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they are going to block it, I would have thought they have decided that already, though seems like mastodon’s head agreed - how much was he paid, I wonder.

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mastodon’s head can’t choose who individual instances federate with. I think he’s in charge of like, one? How many people in this thread have already shown they have no clue how federation works?

      • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, that is why I’m asking the admins of lemmy.world if they are going to block it.

        Also, this is the largest mastrodon server that is likely federating with threads, so not a small deal.

        • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t see what people are afraid of. Lemmy.world can do what it wishes, but I honestly don’t see where the fear comes in. At the very least just mark it invisible. Let those other users see what other alternatives are out there.

          What problem are you trying to fix by blocking them before even seeing what it’s like (without using some vague notions)?

          Will it even natively federate with this format? Just as Mastodon doesn’t default to trying to display posts in its feed and Kbin doesn’t by default show Mastodon or PixelFed, etc. You might be worrying over nothing.

          Your server federated with Mastodon instances. I’m assuming you aren’t inundated with Mastodon posts.

          • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            As long as lemmy.world blocks it, it’s not an issue - for us anyway, I hope. Though meta are devious - you need to be watchful.

      • MBM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mastodon is much more centralised than Lemmy though, so it’s still a big deal

        • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, it isn’t. What are you talking about? Do you even understand the difference between Lemmy and Lemmy.world at this point? Do you understand what I mean when I tell you I don’t use Lemmy?

          • MBM@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mastodon.social is much bigger than the other instances and it’s headed by the devs (just like kbin.social). This is different from Lemmy, where the spread is more even and the devs purposely don’t want to have the largest instance. Have a good day.

            • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That’s not what centralized means, nor does it actually affect anything others mentioned. So, good day to you as well I suppose.

              • fiah@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                “centralized” and “decentralized” are a spectrum, not absolutes. Mastodon might be decentralized in theory but if everyone uses a single instance then it’s centralized in practice. That isn’t the case right now, but it’s also not entirely not the case, either. Same is true for lemmy

                • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This perspective would also make the conversation surrounding it pointless. The proposed idiosyncrasies you suggest don’t change the overall discussion in this thread. It’s a non-actionable perspective. It’s like saying no one can know anything ever. It’s technically philosophically a valid point, but it serves no purpose and doesn’t help in most conversations.

      • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it is not-naive to assume that the ridiculously wealthy Meta, which is known to purchase smaller companies, has met with the much smaller mastodon and offered them money. It may be cynical, however it is not-naive.

        • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s naive to think they’d actually care that much especially since it would hurt them a whole lot more of that info got out. They gain nothing. With the number of level headed people just claiming wait and see is clear that it’s a very widespread concept. There’s no need to pay anyone. It’s simply the principle concept behind the fediverse. It’s admins following the actual principle of the fediverse. They’ll defederate once there’s an actual concrete reason and not a bunch of FUD instead.