• tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This article is utterly devoid of details. I hope to hear more about this soon.

    Edit: apparently I did not read the whole thing. I stopped when I got to this:

    "To continue reading, log in or subscribe.”

    • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cop ran red light, swerved across two lane and hit the gay bar. Then they went after the owner and trumped up an assault charge when witnesses say there was no assault. Oh and first they tried to say they were swerving to miss a dog, then to miss a parked car.

      I think that’s about the jist of it.

    • beerclue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a lot of detail there… Did you go all the way down? Anyway, that’s messed up!

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      … Did you just stop at the title?

      There’s like 25 paragraphs detailing the whole situation. Only thing really missing is the footage NYT supposedly saw.