I used to think that there would be 1, main ‘Fediverse’ with all of the ‘big instances’ connected to each other. The recent Threads debacle has shown me otherwise.

The point of the Fediverse is that there is no one single entity, or group of entities, dominating it all.

Right now it feels like whatever the big instances do, we kind of have to go along with to be a part of anything. As the Fediverse grows, there will be more options to suit different types of users.

I think it’s fine if big instances federate with Threads and it’s fine if they don’t. People can just join instances that align with what they want. It’s not like defederating means being cut out of the Fediverse, that’s not possible.

Great design. I’m eager to see how it plays out.

  • sab@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not. He wants to create a social media that exploits its users without being accused of monopolistic behaviour.

    • SeedyOne@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      All the tasty data collection and surveillance with none of the calories.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        What kind of “tasty data collection and surveillance” will Meta have access to that they didn’t before federating?