Midnight@slrpnk.net to THE POLICE PROBLEM@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoBar owner is arrested after St. Louis police officer crashes into his businesswww.seattletimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1153 cross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.world
arrow-up1153external-linkBar owner is arrested after St. Louis police officer crashes into his businesswww.seattletimes.comMidnight@slrpnk.net to THE POLICE PROBLEM@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square27fedilink cross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.world
minus-squareLufyCZ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoSo if I decide to crash into a tree, do I get charged with attempted murder? Even in cases of reckless driving, the charge is manslaughter, proving murder is gonna be hard unless there’s evidence of premeditation
minus-squarenuez_jr@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 year agoCrashing into a tree would be charged as treeson.
minus-squareNeato@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoDeciding to crash into a person is attempted murder. People live in houses.
minus-squareLufyCZ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoThey crashed into a place of business (as said in the article) at 1230am. No people are around shops at that time. Your argument would never stand in court.
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIs that why the owner and others were still in the building? You’re literally making shit up that doesn’t even apply here.
minus-squareLilB0kChoy@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIt was a bar so it’s very likely there were people around but it would still be hard to prove intent to kill.
So if I decide to crash into a tree, do I get charged with attempted murder?
Even in cases of reckless driving, the charge is manslaughter, proving murder is gonna be hard unless there’s evidence of premeditation
Crashing into a tree would be charged as treeson.
Do we have a /c/treelaw yet?
Deciding to crash into a person is attempted murder. People live in houses.
They crashed into a place of business (as said in the article) at 1230am. No people are around shops at that time.
Your argument would never stand in court.
Is that why the owner and others were still in the building? You’re literally making shit up that doesn’t even apply here.
It was a bar so it’s very likely there were people around but it would still be hard to prove intent to kill.