• Cowbee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Competition doesn’t lead to innovation in improving people’s lives, but company profits. See: enshittification.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see that as a consequence of the absurd monopolies we have. The best product should be what’s the most popular, and enshittification is counter to that. It tanks the product quality, and in a market with lots of competitors, it would be punished.

      • rando895@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is one of the consequences of monopolies, but monopolies are a consequence of economic competition.

        The “winner” gets the losers stuff and customers (mergers for example), making the winner bigger and more able to manipulate the market to their benefit.

        When there are few enough companies profits can be chased without consideration for anything else (planned obsolescence, shipping jobs outside the country, lay-offs, etc.)

        So, like you said except in a for profit market, monopolies are inevitable.

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          In the absence of regulation, absolutely. If we had more stringent anti trust legislation though it might be possible to avoid.

      • Cowbee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The best product should not be what’s most popular in Capitalism, what’s profitable to produce is what’s most profitable. With tons of competition, you just have competing levels of automation, corner cutting, and exploitation.

        Competition and markets in general are the cause of enshittification.