• Hugucinogens
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, I don’t trust them to have actually done what I’m going to describe, (and honestly I’ve just accepted that even with everything off, they’re still giving me ads based on stuff I’ve only talked about and never clicked or written anything), but:

    The programs that recognize specific phrases(Ok Google), are always separate from normal voice recognition (and much much lighter in terms of processing). So, if they weren’t Google, they might have left the “Ok Google” recognition on, but not process anything else that the mic receives.

    They’re probably still listening in though.

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not necessarily you or your case, but I’m still convinced that a lot of people just have confirmation bias (only noticing it when it happens and discounting the thousands of otherwise innocent ads). There’s also subconscious ad effects, like you were only talking about it to begin with because your saw it somewhere because it’s been spreading by weird of mouth from people who initially saw an ad

        • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not just that either. Google knows who your family is. They know who lives with you because of location data. So any time those people search for anything regardless of whether they’re on your home network, they likely serve ads to whole families at a time when one person searches for something.

          • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This has been my theory as well, Google presumably knows when I meet up with a friend for lunch (I don’t know if they go to such lengths but they certainly have access to the data to figure it out), if my friend then starts searching for something related to our conversation afterwards, Google could serve me ads about it too, just inferring the topic of our conversation based on that

      • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t really explain why I was receiving cat litter ads after only speaking with my husband offhand about maybe getting a cat. We didn’t already have a cat, so hadn’t had any reason to look up any cat care goods ever, and I had never searched for anything even remotely cat-related up to that point. But wouldn’t you know it, about 45 minutes later, I was getting kitty litter ads. Very spooky.

        • BossDj@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sorry but I want the true story to be that your husband immediately went off and started googling to find a cat to surprise you for Christmas thus you got cat ads (same network like someone else said).

          • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lmao, I wish but no, no hallmark movie plots here. This was a few years ago, and we now have said cat :) He definitely forgot immediately after I mentioned it until I showed up with a cat one day lol

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the gist of how it likely works; the wake word is detected by an “always on” audio DSP, but a software mode prevents the passing of microphone data back up to the SoC. I’m actually quite familiar with Amazon Echo engineering design, and they implement the “mute” feature in a manner that takes privacy seriously: the LED indicator on that button is hardwired to only turn on when the microphone is literally powered off. Thus, an Echo device can’t even manage such a cheeky response, nor can a software bug or hack enable listening while the mute button is lit.

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      What you describe is actually how it works. If they actually sent all you say to their servers, it would be trivial to detect with a network analyser.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        And if they were found to be sending it all the time, holy fuck the fines would end the company.

        • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Lol, what are you talking about? When was the last time the FTC ended a company over shady privacy practices?

          Amazon would get a fine that would amount to like 0.001% of one day’s profits.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I will say that that’s exactly how the google voice api works. Of course it’s all in a black box, but that’s how the documentation describes it and how it functions when making a voice app

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why listen and risk even a slap on the wrist?

      Recall Target:

      As Pole’s computers crawled through the data, he was able to identify about 25 products that, when analyzed together, allowed him to assign each shopper a “pregnancy prediction” score. More important, he could also estimate her due date to within a small window, so Target could send coupons timed to very specific stages of her pregnancy.

      One Target employee I spoke to provided a hypothetical example. Take a fictional Target shopper named Jenny Ward, who is 23, lives in Atlanta and in March bought cocoa-butter lotion, a purse large enough to double as a diaper bag, zinc and magnesium supplements and a bright blue rug. There’s, say, an 87 percent chance that she’s pregnant and that her delivery date is sometime in late August.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re probably still listening in though.

      Maybe? But also I’ve never seen any evidence of them listening with the mic off or without you saying the “wake word”.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      personally I think its better to be afraid of real things that are happening than things made up by Facebook boomers.

      why this particular issue fools even the most technical of people I’ll never know.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        But Facebook can’t spy on me, I repost the “I DO NOT GIVE FACEBOOK PERMISSION” spam every 3 months without fail!

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          obviously what you vaguely describe has been around since 1945.

          That home assistant devices are constantly listening and feeding back marketing data on every conversation is patent and disproven nonsense.

          they have done packet sniffing investigations, they have disassembled the devices, they have run meters on the electrical charges… everything in every way you can imagine.

          But even if you just think about it for a second - processing a live audio feed at a rate of 1 second per second indefinitely and correlating that data via voice recognition to your Google profile all to… make your ad personalizations… worse? more inaccurate?

          like what the hell is the perceived benefit? That my wife says, “oh my dad found my old barbie house!” while at my neighbors house and my neighbor gets served barbie ads? Why would Google want that?

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        At some point ever you’re going to realize is that the real things you need to be afraid of are largely caused by the stuff made up by Facebook boomers.

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          what specifically? vaccines cause autism/monkeypox, the democrats drink baby blood, trump won the last/next election, Putin is good because he’s only killing Nazis in Ukraine, forest fires are caused by Jewish space lasers, LGBTQ+ folks are grooming children and Bill Gates wants to put microchips in your brain?

          Like — what are you saying, some misinformation is good?

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t run anything from google. I run lineage os.

        You could make the point that the service companies know where you ate all the time but that doesn’t have anything to do with audio that I know of.

      • zaph@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        When I turn my phone’s microphone off and say “hey Google” my phone doesn’t respond in the slightest. Much more comforting.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sound’s like it’s just not sending the data back to Daddy Google. The OK Google/Alexa bit is done on a custom chip on the device. Clearly that bit isn’t being turned off, but anything after that isn’t being sent anywhere.

    Probably just saves support calls this way from idiots who turn it off and forget.

  • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Voice assistants are money losing products. If they can do something like processing the wakewords on the device before chosing to send to a server they will. These companies are far too stingy to continuously stream audio to their servers

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Back in the day when everything had to be processed server-side sure.

      Now we have purpose-built hardware helping work this shit out. The devices are basically capable of handling native language resolution locally. They’re no longer need to farm the data out. I still don’t think they’re doing this we would see it in the open source operating systems, but if they wanted to any late model cell phone would be absolutely fine parsing out your interests from your conversations. Hell, I’m sure the contents of this dictation I’m making now are being reduced and added to my social graph at Google.

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this should be fairly easy to test yourself. Just disconnect from the WAN, say the wake word, and see if the device responds.

    • books@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Someone can correct me if I’m wrong but home assistant is currently struggling with this and is processing everything on your local box because it can’t do wakewords on the device.

      • ReadingCat@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think they’re choosing to do it that way. Raspberry pi’s easily have that capability to do the wake word recognition on device (i think they are also working on that). Esp’s on the other hand, can only stream audio to the server and not much more. Since esp’s are far cheaper than installing a raspberry in each room, they are focusing to do wake word detection on the server not on device.

    • Pohl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. If it is practical and money can be made doing it, then continuous, ambient sound parsing will be the norm. Currently it seems like it’s not a valuable business. When it is valuable to them, they will add a checkbox somewhere in your account to disable it, and most people will not be bothered enough to look for it.

    • byroon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah what possible use could this company, whose business model relies on surveillance, have for surveiling you

  • simin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    only if phones can be like thinkpads which you can easily remove say the audio card from its motherboard.

  • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also, why isn’t there a slide cover to physically cover the camera, and why can’t I turn off the mic and camera separately? So I just use one of those black foam stickers to cover the camera.

  • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If this is a normal Android app, the solution to this is simply to disable the Google app. pretty sure all the voice related shit and google lens and all that crap is tied to the Google app.