• FMT99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 months ago

    Just wish they’d make these things a bit more affordable. Taking the train to Paris or London with my family is literally twice the price of flying and god knows how many times driving. I’d much rather take the train.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      The train takes you right in the city centre though. If you fly you usually have to buy an extra train ticket to get to your actual destination.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh yes, of course. You would think operating a train would be cheaper than flying if you excluded the initial capital investment costs of actually building the line.

      • FMT99@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes, but it doesn’t double the cost. We usually end up just driving which is even cheaper than flying, even including the crazy parking costs. And relatively low carbon compared to flying. Taking the train would make it very hard to justify the cost.

        • freebee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          A car with most or all seats taken is usually not that bad in carbon footprint, it’s very different from the 1 person per car with 4 empty seats in a daily commute footprint. For me, longer distance, the train is just a lot more comfortable than a car (if you don’t have to switch trains too often).

    • freebee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      On many routes within Germany, ICE is actually the best price/comfort deal imo. Trains always suck when crossing borders somehow.