I just read this point in a comment and wanted to bring it to the spotlight.

Meta has practically unlimited resources. They will make access to the fediverse fast with their top tier servers.

As per my understanding this will make small instances less desirable to the common user. And the effects will be:

  1. Meta can and will unethically defedrate from instances which are a theat to them. Which the majority of the population won’t care about, again making the small instances obsolete.
  2. When majority of the content is on the Meta servers they can and will provide fast access to it and unethically slow down access to the content from outside instances. This will be noticeable but cannot be proved, and in the end the common users just won’t care. They will use Threads because its faster.

This is just what i could think of, there are many more ways to be evil. Meta has the best engineers in the world who will figure out more discrete and impactful ways to harm the small instances.

Privacy: I know they can scrape data from the fediverse right now. That’s not a problem. The problem comes when they launch their own Android / iOS app and collect data about my search and what kind of Camel milk I like.

My thoughts: I think building our own userbase is better than federating with an evil corp. with unlimited resources and talent which they will use to destroy the federation just to get a few users.

I hope this post reaches the instance admins. The Cons outweigh the Pros in this case.

We couldn’t get the people to use Signal. This is our chance to make a change.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Growth at any cost is the mindset that not only ruins anything good for profit, it is also the exact issue we are facing now in real life with the right gaining traction in many liberal and multicultural democracies.

      Because everyone is being let in, without a second thought on if they even should be there, we now have massive social issues with not at all integrated subcultures in Europe that embrace values diametrically opposed to our tolerant and pluralist societies, in turn empowering the right to ruin any progress made in an effort to throw out the brown people again.

      The right question to ask is not “can we accept this new member to our society?”, the right question is “should we accept this new member into our society based on their beliefs and values, based on if they can contribute anything to the existing society?”

      And to return to the matter at hand, this is what the fediverse is supposed to be. A bunch of communities and little realms, each with their own rules and interests but united in their belief that self determination and democratic structures make for a better and more fair internet. And then we have the meta intruder we are about to welcome with open arms, without any rules or expectations of him to adopt our values and culture, so they bring their own, corporate, centralized culture and use their money to brute force that culture into every place of importance.

      It is not racist or intolerant of societies to expect newcomers to assimilate, and ignoring that fact brought us a re emerging right.

      And it is not fearmongering or small minded to be extremely sceptical of Facebook trying to establish themselves in the fediverse, they are literally the OG data and privacy violating corporation, they invented echo chambers and connecting extremists. There is zero value to the fediverse in welcoming meta. The only one who wins if that happens is meta.

      • Nobody@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. Facebook is a known bad actor. There is absolutely no reason to believe their intentions are anything but evil. Pretending Threads is just another instance is both naive and dangerous. It is a cancer. If allowed to federate, it will metastacize.

        • masterspace@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Facebook is not evil, advertising is.

          The people at Facebook aren’t sitting there plotting to make the world worse, they’re just sitting there figuring out how to make the numbers go up and since they’re an advertising driven business, that means engagement metrics, which leads to the vast majority of their resultant evil. The advertising / engagement driven business model is what is actually evil and what could actually be addressed by legislators.

    • TaleOfSam@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meta willingly under-moderated across large swaths of east Asia and Africa, leading to unchecked rumors and tangible acts of genocide. Zuckerberg has compared himself to Augustus Caesar.

      I think it’s acceptable to cut off a wildfire before it spreads.

      • CyanPurple@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gotta love the fact Meta contributed to how my country got a murderer and the son of a dictator as presidents. Real great and trustworthy company there /s

        • masterspace@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m not asking you to trust them, I’m asking how defederating accomplishes anything? They got more users than the entire fediverse in a single day. We are not hurting them by cutting them off, we are merely making the fediverse seem more like a barren hostile place for a bunch of weirdo nerds.

          • snooggums@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            34
            ·
            1 year ago

            The goal is not to hurt meta, but to keep meta from hurting the rest of the federated sites. Like not inviting a known their to the community barbecue because they are known to have stolen tons of food from other community meals. We aren’t keeping them from creating their own dinner or anything by not federating, just keeping them away from ours.

            • masterspace@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Except in this analogy, Meta hasn’t stolen food before. They run the largest bbq around, and have bought out previous corporate competitor bbqs, and now they’re hosting a giant bbq one way or another, they’re just suggesting you put a gate in the fence so that people can flow back and forth between the small community bbq and their large corporate one.

              Is that going to make you nervous since they have such a cool giant bbq that people are inevitably going to want to go there? Yeah, but again, that’s the case regardless of whether or not the gate goes in.

              • snooggums@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                1 year ago

                Shilling for Meta is a bad look.

                They steal people’s data and don’t follow data privacy laws. They draw people in with unethical business practices, not fair competition like in your example.

                People are not worried about people using Meta outside of the fediverse. In your analogy Meta is already easily accessible through the internet in general and people can feel free to use both without needing a special gate.

                • masterspace@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Shilling for Meta is a bad look.

                  Does it look like I care whether or not I agree with the hive mind?

                  They draw people in with unethical business practices, not fair competition like in your example.

                  My example included them buying out their competition which is not fair, it’s blatantly anti-competitive. Fairness has nothing to do with anything I wrote.

                  People are not worried about people using Meta outside of the fediverse. In your analogy Meta is already easily accessible through the internet in general and people can feel free to use both without needing a special gate.

                  And in my example the gate doesn’t harm the fediverse at all, it just makes it more convenient for users of both bbqs, being my entire point. There is nothing to be lost by federating with Meta.

              • Sabata11792@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                Meta is showing up to the neighborhood bbq to shoot the cook and buy the grill from the estate sale. There also going to call it supporting the grieving family.

          • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            ·
            1 year ago

            FB is a known source for targeted misinfo campaigns. If I log into those services right now Im pretty much gaurenteed to have misinfo on my landing page.

            why federate with that?

          • CyanPurple@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            1 year ago

            Defederating means not interacting with the crowd Meta brings in. I have a bunch of other reasons but that’s my main one. And before you suggest blocking, you can’t possibly expect me to block all 10M of their users and the domain block is bugged. I know because I tried.

            Besides, this place doesn’t look like much of a barren wasteland since we’re interacting with a bunch of people right now. I don’t mind interacting with only weirdo nerds if they’re nicer people. Quantity doesn’t mean quality after all.

            For the people who want to interact with Threads because of family and friends, they should just make an account there. Just don’t let Meta destroy this small part of the internet.

            • masterspace@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Your argument entirely boils down to “domain blocking is still buggy”, when Threads doesn’t even support ActivityPub yet.

              Once it launches, just block their instance.

              • CyanPurple@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                I was gonna type out a really neat itemized response but I don’t think you’re discussing in good faith, just like Meta and Threads. I’d rather take a nap

                • masterspace@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Defederating means not interacting with the crowd Meta brings in. I have a bunch of other reasons but that’s my main one. And before you suggest blocking, you can’t possibly expect me to block all 10M of their users and the domain block is bugged. I know because I tried.

                  Your point here is that blocking all of meta’s instance is too hard because instance blocking is buggy.

                  Besides, this place doesn’t look like much of a barren wasteland since we’re interacting with a bunch of people right now. I don’t mind interacting with only weirdo nerds if they’re nicer people. Quantity doesn’t mean quality after all.

                  This is just refuting my characterization of this place as barren.

                  For the people who want to interact with Threads because of family and friends, they should just make an account there. Just don’t let Meta destroy this small part of the internet.

                  This is saying nothing other than “Meta will destroy the fediverse”, again, without articulating how that would be possible.

                  • CyanPurple@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I’m bored right now so I’ll bite. I know arguing with you is bad cuz you shouldn’t do things that make you angry yadda yadda. But I really want to tickle that brain of yours and what goes in it.

                    • Why do you think Meta specifically targeted the Fediverse?

                    • Given their history with Whatsapp and Instagram, how sure are you that they won’t use EEE to kill the Fediverse?

                    • Considering the Fediverse is what people see as an escape to corporate social media, why is it unreasonable for people to be hostile to Meta’s Threads?

                    • Why should we give Meta the benefit of the doubt when they’re willing to sell out people’s data even if it means destroying democratic institutions?

                    • I saw you mention earlier about lack of moderation. How exactly would federating with an additional 10M Meta Threads user affect moderation or lack thereof?

                    • How would the culture of Fediverse affect the sudden flood of Threads users unfamiliar with Fediverse?

                    • Do you think Meta created Threads in good faith given the recent events with Twitter?

                    Your thoughts on the matter please:

                    • Are you for or against federation with Meta?
                    • Would your family and friends on Threads affect your decision above?
                    • Do you trust Meta?
          • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            place for a bunch of weirdo nerds.

            So we don’t get a space at all?

            -A Weirdo Nerd

      • masterspace@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Lemmy is run by a bunch of tankies and the entire fediverse is under-moderated.

        Cutting off a ton of users and content from the fediverse is stupid and everyone in here just keeps coming up with vague generalities because they’re scared of Meta rather than have actually thought through what will happen and be able to articulate any actual harms.

        • icydefiance@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          40
          ·
          1 year ago

          People have articulated all kinds of actual harms, including two possibilities in the OP, but frankly they’re irrelevant.

          We know what Meta’s goals are, and we know they have absolutely no moral standards whatsoever. Exactly how they try to accomplish those goals doesn’t matter. We shouldn’t give them the opportunity to try anything.

          We should be scared of Meta, and we should keep them as far away as possible. Anything else is reckless and stupid at best.

          • masterspace@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            People have articulated all kinds of actual harms, including two possibilities in the OP, but frankly they’re irrelevant.

            No, they didn’t. The harm listed was that Meta will make a shinier platform that will syphon away users, that is happening regardless and is not a harm that is a result of federation, it’s a harm that’s a result of meta having more money to build a better platform.

            We know what Meta’s goals are, and we know they have absolutely no moral standards whatsoever. Exactly how they try to accomplish those goals doesn’t matter. We shouldn’t give them the opportunity to try anything.

            There goal is to launch a twitter competitor with a lot of users and make money off advertising. Nothing about that conflicts with the fediverse.

            Like I said, this thread is filled with a bunch of people shaking in their boots about the company who must not be named rather than actually providing sober rational assessment of what’s likely to happen.

              • masterspace@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, I’ve read that, and it’s not an example of a corporation killing a decentralized network through federation, it’s just a normal example of a corporation killing a decentralized network by having more money to make a better app.

                XMPP did not die because Google used that protocol, it died because people preferred using Google Talk over any of the XMPP apps. That would be the case regardless of whether Google used XMPP or not.

            • jerdle_lemmy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, you think they give a shit about the fediverse? They’re using ActivityPub because it’s easier for them. They’re not going to want to EEE us, because there’s not enough of us to matter to them.

              • icydefiance@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s not easier for them, and once there’s enough people to matter then it’s too late to kill it. The fediverse is growing, and they want to stop that before the fediverse is big enough to matter.

        • Marxine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Boo hoo tankies bad, but big corpo run by billionaires who spread misinformation and intentionally act to topple legitimate governments in favor of their fascist agenda are akshually good”

          Arguing with people like you (corporate shill) is a waste of time, so I’d rather have fun instead.

        • skillissuer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          i’ll take those “tankies” over completely unaccountable thiel’s buddies any day. actual tankies seem to be contained to lemmygrad where they don’t bother anyone outside of their instance

        • awderon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          The reactions you are seeing are based off of Metas history. We will see how it works out.

          • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            i have no reason to believe anything will be different going forward, the same person is in charge and they have already stated they have the same plans here that they did on thier other projects.

            why pretend its going to be “different this time”?

            • awderon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didn’t mean to pretend that this will be any different. My hope is, that there will be some people who will see that there is an alternative to big tech and maybe drop Threads in favour of a real fediverse instance.

              • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                if they bomb the federation with misinfo as FB produces then its going to be interesting getting thier notice and bringing them over without turning the open network into a pit of questionable assertions. maybe airlock federations? oneway sync?

        • flipht@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Real life is not speech and debate, and it isn’t an ad hominem to look at Meta’s past actions and to expect that they will continue in the same way.

          We don’t have to have a crystal ball and be able to detail exactly what will happen and when to know that this is bad news. Expecting random internet users to outthink a mega corp and send an accurate and verified copy of their plan is absurd, and it seems like a bad faith attempt at discussion.

        • Smallletter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do people think socialists or communists are bothered by this term tankie? It’s like called a white person cracker. It’s not really the effect youre hoping for, I promise.

    • losttourist@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is that any different from what we have now?

      Threads has launched, but has federation disabled. So right now Threads is a standalone system, and it and the Fediverse cannot intercommunicate.

      If Threads later adds in federation but all the of the Fediverse blocks them, we’re in exactly the situation that exists right this minute. And that doesn’t seem to be hurting the Fediverse at all.

      • Saturdaycat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been on Instagram for 3 years trying to build up an art profile, sharing my artwork. I think it’s not Us vs Them, all sorts of people are spread out everywhere online.

        I’m happy to be here on the fediverse with my fediverse accounts, not threads. I’m extremely despondent about threads existing.

        • Calcharger@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No reason to be despondent until they actually make the leap to the fediverse and we discuss what the plan is to federate. Threads will not automatically federated with everyone. We will have a long time to look at what threads is and what kind of content they will bring

        • Leraje@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          Based on your posts so far my friend, its becoming clearer why you think there’s no one to interact with.

          • masterspace@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lol, ironically my comments in this thread going against the hive mind have gotten more interaction than any others

        • VanillaGorilla@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I was interested in those people and their content I could go there. I’m here because I absolutely do not want to see any of it.

          • masterspace@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I assume you only subscribed to text based subreddits then? Never once clicked on an image or gif that came from IG / Tiktok /etc.?

            My god stop being such a gatekeeping judgemental douche. Tons of reddit content was on subs like r/aww and /r/animalsbeingderps that was exactly as trite as the stuff posted on IG, if it wasn’t directly copied from it.

            • Calcharger@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              I am on TikTok and was on Reddit. I like my FYP on TikTok. I go on Instagram to see what old friends are up to and the suggested content is awful and mean spirited. Same with Facebook. I don’t want that crap here

        • Calcharger@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am finding plenty of content to interact with here. It just might not be my first choice, but I’m getting along fine. It’s still early

    • kiddblur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I personally don’t want that. I want to be able to log in to mastodon or lemmy without needing a facebook account and be able to interact with my less tech savvy friends and family, as well as get news from journalists/bands/sports teams/etc.

        • Xeelee@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If we federate with Meta, we will be immediately drowned out by the huge user numbers of the Meta properties. They already have more users on day one than the entire fediverse.

          • masterspace@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I mean, if they actually subscribe to threads and discussions across instances, and isn’t that kind of the point of a social network? For users to use it? Also odd that half the arguments against it are that it will kill the fediverse and half of the arguments are that it will provide too many users to the fediverse.

    • Anomander@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think so; it won’t hurt ‘us’ anymore than we were hurt yesterday, when Threads hadn’t launched yet.