• assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think this an overly simplistic way to look at the dynamic. Users are the primary customer, and they don’t provide any direct revenue to the company. Their value is in attracting the secondary customers though, who directly pay the company to access the users. Bring a primary customer implies that the company still needs to treat you as a customer and at least not openly antagonize you. They can’t take you for granted as a product. There is no secondary customer without you.

    It’s like bars that advertise free drinks for women on certain nights. The women aren’t directly paying the bar, but the men who come to the bar because of them makes it a net profit. I’m sure there’s other examples of this primary/secondary customer dynamic. Anything cheap for kids that sells expensive stuff to parents for instance.

    • geissi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      overly simplistic way

      It was hyperbolic of course. But really,

      Users are the primary customer, and they don’t provide any direct revenue

      How can someone who doesn’t provide revenue be the primary customer of a profit oriented company? Ahead of others who actually do, like advertisers?

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It might be better if the terms are swapped. I’m only calling them primary because they have to come first before the secondary, and they’re the foundation for everything. There’s probably a better way to term them.

        • geissi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, I’m not denying that the users are the foundation for the business model but when Reddit makes business decisions, they first listen to those who pay them.