• Jay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    More like all the new strains of covid that appeared over time.

    • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Maybe they meant that, but I have a feeling they didn’t.

      Influenza would be a better example there given the extensive recorded history of its mutations.

      • Jay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Flu works as an example too, but with covid we saw mutations coming nearly in realtime by comparison with how closely it was being monitored.

        • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Fair point, it’s certainly closer to the zeitgeist as well.

          Which is kind of sad given the damage flu did last season, and likely will this season.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        So there is a perfectly reasonable explanation for their comment, but you refuse to accept it? Because of a feeling? A feeling that you can’t quite articulate? Dare I say it… Faith?

        • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It was a different person responding…

          I don’t accept one person’s opinion as evidence of another’s. That’s dumb as shit.

          Since you brought it up: I’m not a believer in any God. I do believe that the theory of evolution is true.

          • Windex007@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s an application of Occam’s Razor. It’s an application of the Principal of Charity. It’s an application of some of the most basic concepts of philosophy.

            I think it’s an extreme position to say that it’s dumb as shit.

            • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              And yet you’re accusing me of faith I don’t have while providing no evidence of your interpretation, but insisting that it’s correct anyway.

              I think that’s dumb as shit.

              • Windex007@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                You work incredibly hard to interpret what people say to conclude that they’re dumb and wrong, when there are much simpler interpretations available.