• @traches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      526 months ago

      Title text: If that doesn’t fix it, git.txt contains the phone number of a friend of mine who understands git. Just wait through a few minutes of ‘It’s really pretty simple, just think of branches as…’ and eventually you’ll learn the commands that will fix everything.

      • @popcar2@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        106 months ago
        • git pull

        • git add *

        • git commit -m “Some stuff”

        • git push

        And occasionally when you mess up

        • git reflog

        • git reset HEAD@{n} (where n is where you wanna roll back to)

        And occasionally if you mess up so hard you give up

        • git reset --hard origin/main

        And there you go. You are now a master at using git. Try not to mess up.

    • @expr@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      56 months ago

      Good luck doing anything remotely complicated/useful in git with an IDE. You get a small fraction of what git can do with a tool that allows absolutely 0 scripting and automation.

      • @calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        156 months ago

        IDE git is less powerful than CLI git. However I’m pretty confident that most people use more features of git by using a GUI.

        CLI feature discoverability is pretty awful, you have to go out of your way and type git help to learn new commands.

        With a GUI though, all the buttons are there, you just have to click a new button that you’ve been seeing for a while and the GUI will guide you how to use it.

      • @derpgon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        96 months ago

        It sounds like you don’t speak from experience. I have all the automation I need. It supports git hooks on top of IDE-only features like code checking.

        If I have to fire up my CLI for some mass history rewriting (like changing an author for every commit), or when the repo breaks - so be it. But by not using the CLI I save my fingers and sanity, because committing a bunch of files is several click away with little to no room for error.

        I can rebase, patch, drop, rename, merge, revert, cherry pick, and solve conflicts with a click of a button rather than remembering all the commands and whatnot.

    • @CodingCarpenter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      I was looking for this comment. PHP storm and git are like best friends. I very very rarely need to resort to the CLI and generally that’s for hard resetting after I screw something up

  • arthurpizza
    link
    fedilink
    English
    296 months ago

    Learning git will give you the tools to work on projects on any git platform. It doesn’t matter if I’m in Forgejo, Gitlab, or Github.

  • @criticalimpact@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    CLI
    Though I will admit it took me a while to get there
    git add -i is where the true magic begins

  • @hightrix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    236 months ago

    GitHub desktop Stan here. Been a software engineer for over a decade and still love my UI tools. GitHub desktop is good enough 99% of the time.

    • Aatube
      link
      fedilink
      126 months ago

      Any windows screenshots?

      (Fork is also an awful name in terms of searching for it btw)

      • katy ✨
        link
        56 months ago

        sadly no and i don’t think it works through wine

        but technically they have a mac client which is basically an expensive version of linux

      • @TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        36 months ago

        I wish! The best Linux git gui I have found is SmartGit. I like it, but it’s just a little goofy and not free. Fork is better for its ability to very easily stage and/or stash a subset of the current changeset.

        Anyone got any suggestions? I tried git-cola and gitkraken. The former I found obtuse and limited, and the latter is not free in addition to somehow making git harder with a pretty gui.

        • Aatube
          link
          fedilink
          36 months ago

          Gitkraken is free as long as the repository is public, which seems like an alright compromise to me. The only problem I had with it was that it was electron. What did it make harder for you?

        • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The best ones I have found for Linux are SmartGit and Sublime Merge, but neither are free in any sense. Sublime Merge is slightly cheaper. SmartGit offers a free “hobby license” but it limits which kinds of repos you can work with.

          Gitkraken looks like it might be good but I haven’t used it.

        • @BaardFigur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          SmartGit is free if you use a hobby license. Cannot use it for commercial projects, but if using it for commercial projects you should be able to afford it

    • @ramenshaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      I hate coding on Windows, maybe I’ll check that out. (My only option is Windows for my work laptop because I need to use a few Windows-only softwares and IT says I’m not allowed to dual boot)

      • 🐍🩶🐢
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 months ago

        Is running Linux off a USB drive possible? It isn’t ideal, but you can still have persistence if needed? There is also WSL, if you don’t need a GUI.

        • @ramenshaman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          After the last windows update WSL gives me a BSoD every time 😭 Pretty sure IT wouldn’t appreciate me running Ubuntu off a USB drive but that’s a good idea.

  • @JonsJava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    176 months ago

    I’d love to like the desktop app, but I just don’t understand what it’s doing under the hood when I click a button. When I click an icon, is it syncing my changes up as it pulls down, it just pulling down? I guess point and click is more scary to me when prod is on the line.

    • @dukk@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      46 months ago

      Freaking love TUIs, it’s like they took the convenience of a GUI and the efficiency of the CLI and merged them. As a Neovim and Lazygit user myself it’s amazing what I can accomplish in but a few keypresses.

    • @tahoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      66 months ago

      Yup! Been using it for years, it looks nice, has a good UI and works well. I’ll use the CLI if I need to but 99% of the time Desktop is the better choice (for me).

  • @BaardFigur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    116 months ago

    Another gui client, such as Git Fork. Much easier to fine tune what I commit, and see commit history, with a gui client. Certain things are better to do in the command line, but I really don’t get why so many people hate gui clients

    • @Piatro@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      I think for most people it’s whatever you got used to first. I agree the hatred the GUIs get is overblown. I would always recommend people learn the command line but if you want to use a GUI, go for it, doesn’t affect me unless your commits are bad, in which case the CLI wouldn’t have helped anyway.

    • @Xanvial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      This is what I currently use, although I don’t really like the branch name color in last few versions, so kinda keep using the old version