Found this post super informative as it relates to Mastodon, and thought Lemmy might also benefit from this perspective. I’m not sure I share his optimism, but his points seem sound to dampen some of the alarm bells over Meta joining the Fediverse.

  • Steeve@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Lol are you serious? What, did you want a little bubble on the internet where corporations don’t exist? What does “open source” mean to you, open to only the entities you allow in? Like the article says, join an instance that defederates every corporate entity or make your own, but don’t blame developers of open source software for keeping it open.

      • Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then join an instance that’s defederated with them, or create your own. It’s literally that simple. Don’t shit on open source devs for keeping their software open source.

          • Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh god, “shilling”. Yep, there’s that Reddit paranoia. Everyone who disagrees with me a robot!

            There are two topics here, Meta and beans. Of course I’m talking about one of them lmao

            And read the original comment I replied to saying Mastadon devs are “in bed with vipers”. That’s what I would consider “shitting on”.

              • Steeve@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                My comments downplay the “threat” because I don’t believe it’s a threat, and if a single corporation joining the fediverse somehow actually destroys it then it wasn’t going to be around long anyways.

                If you read all my comments you should know that. I’m not a fucking shill because I disagree with you ffs.

          • JeffCraig@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Uh, we need participation from everyone in order for the fediverse to have legitimacy. We unfortunately need those cringe users if we want large scale adoption. Without it everything stays small scale, developers aren’t attracted to the concept and people leave for functioning alternatives.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not embracing Meta. All it says is, once it is federated, they may be interoperable. That’s it. You could view stuff on Threads and Threads users could view stuff elsewhere (unless your instance defederates from Threads).

      • Heastes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Embrace, extend, extinguish is exactly what first came to my mind when I heard about threads planning to federate. I think it is a huge risk.

      • Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everyone has seen it, it isn’t food for thought. It’s a Microsoft playbook from the 90s/early 00s that wasn’t even targeting open source software and wasn’t even successful as a means of targeting competitive freeware.

        • IWriteDaCode@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dude quit being a dick. You work for Facebook or something? This is a real conversation. This isn’t reddit, this isn’t facebook, this isn’t twitter. We don’t just dunk on people here.

          • Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            How on earth is that “dunking”? Disagreeing with you is being a dick now? Jesus lol

    • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Open source” means anyone can use or reuse the source code, it doesn’t require you to show content from entities you don’t trust.

      The great thing about the fediverse is that we are all free to create or join instances that have federation policies we prefer.

      • Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. Mastadon devs aren’t “in bed with vipers” because they aren’t somehow closing their open source software to an entity.

        • MBM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          None of this has anything to do with Mastodon’s source code though, I don’t know why you keep bringing up open source

          • Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Read the first comment in this thread about Mastadon’s devs being “in bed with vipers”

            • MBM@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I assumed that was about mastodon.social not defederating and Eugene Rochko saying not to worry about Threads

              • Steeve@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Eugene Rochko even says to join a server that defederates Meta if you want in the article.