I feel like it used to be size, color, and clarity meant more expensive. Now I look at a 500$ 4k TV and a 2000$ 4k TV and I don’t know what the difference is. They can both be smart TVs, be the same size, and have a lot of same advertised features, but what are the subtle unspoken mysteries that justify a huge price gap?

  • CarlsIII@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do we even need to pay attention to stuff like black level or color range anymore? I remember that being a big deal when HDTVs were newer, but now you can’t even find that information about new TVs.

    • Synthead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I sure do, although OLEDs pretty much have an infinite black level, and the color range is unparalleled to LCDs.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I might be speaking as a old ignorant fool, but I feel like much of the features in the past 20 years of tvs were just marketing. Or maybe I’m no longer that interested in how many vibrant colors or frames a TV can do. I may go “wow” for the first ten minutes, but then it just fades into the background.

      Like getting excited over a toaster.

    • OhmsLawn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My primary concern buying a TV would be UX. If the menu system is well thought out and they’re not spamming the user with advertising, it’s probably a good indicator that they’re investing in good hardware too.

      Not that I wouldn’t totally geek out for weeks watching reviews and learning all the minutiae of light levels and color accuracy before pulling the trigger. The research is half the fun.