• Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hot take (I’ll accept my downward facing arrows, thank you), but people regularly vastly overestimate the safety and docility of “regular” dogs too

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’re absolutely correct. Any dog over about 10kg has the power to cause serious injury, especially to a child or other dog/pet. Greyhounds have a horrendous prey drive and will eat your cat in 2 seconds flat

      • Chocrates@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I tried to rehabilitate a dangerous dog and failed and now find myself with another one (thankfully MUCH less prone to biting). “regular” dogs are one abusive/neglectful adolescence away from being unsafe

        • Emerald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          11 months ago

          Pitbulls also have the issue of being abused at higher rates then other breeds. It’s not all genetic

            • Woht24@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              11 months ago

              You’re half correct.

              Pitbulls, Staffordshire terriers, Bullies etc, are all variations of same or similar breeds. These breeds are viewed as ‘tough’ and are treated and trained as such by their owners. They also aren’t treated like family dogs by these people who buy them for their tough image either.

              You get a few generations like this, a couple idiots who don’t desex or seperate their dogs on heat and you’ve got the beginning of a problem.

              I’m Australian and in animal control, bull breeds are always number 1 for attacks every year but working breeds are VERY close behind, think Cattledog, Kelpie, German Shepherd etc.

              If you look at the skewed breed ownership statistics, there Staffys and Bull breeds get a bad wrap from being incredibly popular and very poorly taken care of.

            • Liz@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Gotta love when they don’t bother to normalize their statistics so it’s basically just a question of human population density.

        • Woht24@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Pitbulls, bull terriers, Staffordshire terriers etc are no worse than other dogs. I work in animal control, it’s a big misconception.

        • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          No. They just often have shit owners who either want them to be aggressive or habe no ideas about dogs but think pitbulls are cool

        • joel_feila@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If only regular people could id pitbulls. No really it hard for average people to do that. Really compromises all our data.