fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoHumanities be likemander.xyzimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1276
arrow-up1276imageHumanities be likemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-square1024_Kibibytes@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up53·1 year agoNaN is specifically not a number.
minus-squareIron Lynx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41·1 year agoConclusion: Javascript is Neutral Evil
minus-squareFlickOfTheBean@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoNow that’s a characterization I can get behind!
minus-square1024_Kibibytes@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-21 year agoThat is a valid point. Also, I learned something about JavaScript. Thank you!
minus-squaregandalf_der_12te@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoWell, it’s something like the difference between { x: null } and { }.
minus-squareDieterlan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoThat’s why it’s in the Evil row
minus-squareNarrrz@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI feel like it belongs more in the chaotic row
NaN is specifically not a number.
> typeof NaN "number"Conclusion: Javascript is Neutral Evil
Always has been
Now that’s a characterization I can get behind!
That is a valid point. Also, I learned something about JavaScript. Thank you!
Well, it’s something like the difference between
{ x: null }and{ }.That’s why it’s in the Evil row
I feel like it belongs more in the chaotic row