• chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Honestly I have much less of a problem with some degree of inaccurate info than wasting my time by not immediately geting to the point in concisely giving me the bit of syntax I was searching for to begin with. That’s what they’ve always got right that other sources were getting wrong.

    • BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh so I have absolutely no reason to even like w3c at all? Dont use w3cschools much anymore these days. I know they have other stuff for more languages but theres better resources when it comes to those.

        • BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They allowed for the inclusion of DRM into HTML5. This DRM is not open-source, can’t even be source audited and refused to back down. Such a move caused the EFF (electronic frontier foundation) to resign from the group. Here’s the EFF’s letter where they outline these issues if you want to give it a read: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/09/open-letter-w3c-director-ceo-team-and-membership

          I could also write about them bowing to Google but the DRM thing annoys me more.

          And then Tim Berners-Lee has the audacity to complain about the state of the internet. Something his group could’ve actually stopped or slowed.

    • Tag365@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m pretty sure that trademarks were invented so companies could prevent confusion like this by using the legal system. That way no-one can try profiting off a similar branding, and no-one can harm their reputation by making poor products apparently in another company’s name. W3C has a trademark registration for their name. https://www.w3.org/trademarks/