• jalkasieni@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    No one is claiming that it’s not possible to hone your floorsweeping skills over the course of 50 years and become a sweeper yoda. What they are saying though, is that the difference between the yoda and the apprentice is neglibile from a customers perspective. That’s just factual, if the apprentice wasn’t good enough for the average client, the yodas would be in high demand and be able to set their own rates, thus becoming skilled labor.

    • Star
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Removed by mod

      • stevehobbes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Because if your employer doesn’t pay what you’re worth to other employers, you go to those other employers.

        It’s easier than ever to see what jobs are worth as many locations require employers to publish salary bands or hourly rate right on the internet. You can find all the jobs near you that are similar and compare pay without so much as going on an interview.

        • Star
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Removed by mod

          • stevehobbes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            A couple of things. First off, teaching is unique - every public school I’m aware of is unionized. Which is to say there is a collective bargain between the workers and the district. Teachers have far more say in their pay than non-union employees.

            Secondly, they can go teach in private schools if they pay more or change careers if they think they can get paid more or have a better quality of life doing something else.

            Or they can simply try to get people to vote down their next CBA if they think they aren’t paid enough and force the district to pay more.

            Third, I never said anything is “worth it”, but the calculus for teachers is different. The CBA getting voted on by the teachers means your compensation is heavily backloaded towards end of career and retirement. You also have significantly better benefit plans than private sector jobs, because that’s what the union membership voted for.

            You can retire in most school districts after 20 years and get paid 2/3rds of your salary for life. Good luck doing that in the private sector. Which is why you’ll also probably get paid less than other jobs with comparable skill sets over those 20 years.

            • Star
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Removed by mod

              • stevehobbes@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                The school districts will start paying more money, that’s how this works. It takes a while, there will be short term shortages before school districts renegotiate the CBA and a lag before more college kids get teaching certificates.

                Or states will lower the requirements to be teachers, and hire less qualified teachers, and more middle-and-above income households will send their kids to private or charter schools.

                You have a lot more power in the union than you think - at least collectively. The people you elect negotiate the CBA. And then you get to vote on that CBA. Convince your peers to vote no next time until you get a better contract.

                Legally prevented from striking… what does that even mean. If you strike they can fire you? If you’re going to quit anyway, who cares? Lots of states (37) make it unlawful for public employees to strike. They do it anyway. And win.

                Or don’t, and find a new job.

                Teacher salaries suck - but they also sucked 5, 10 and 20 years ago too.

                • Star
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Removed by mod

                  • stevehobbes@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    I’m telling you that you shouldn’t be surprised it’s the way it is. Because it was this way when you started.

                    Every union seems to do this - they backload pay and benefits. It happens to pilots (until the most recent CBA rounds) and flight attendants too. They get paid literally almost nothing and have to share rooms with 4 other people until they’ve gotten 10-20 years in, in which case they start making pretty decent money.

                    Teachers are the same. They vote for you to make $30,000/yr with shitty raises, but at 30 years in you’re making $100k/year and will retire with $66k/year for the rest of your life in addition to social security.

                    Adjusted slightly based on district.

                    It’s always been like this and you knew it when you started.

                    Sure, try to improve it and make it better - but don’t act surprised like it’s new.

                    If only everyone got CEO raises, too bad not everyone is a CEO.