The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you’ve already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

  • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the investors who are paying the cheques of course. They are corporations, they can afford to spend some coins on [checks notes] living wages.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s exactly it. Investors. They are not donations. They expect a return on their investments.

      • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And such “return” comes after the work, not before. So there’s no reason to condition the wages to do the work, on the potential that the work might be sold or not and to what amount of people. Now that would be air-quotes “stealing”!

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And such “return” comes after the work

          And once again, where do you suppose it comes from?

          So there’s no reason to condition the wages to do the work, on the potential that the work might be sold or not and to what amount of people.

          How does one “condition wages”?

          Is your argument simply that theft is a-ok 👌 when the person you’re stealing from is wealthy?