Panera, formerly Panera Bread.

This is THE SECOND person who died from drinking this.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure, I just don’t think it should be expected policy. Caffeine is a very safe drug, and it only really causes problems if you have other serious health conditions.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or if you consume extremely large amounts! Three lemonades is many many times the safe dose.

      Like, at this level I think hallucinations become possible lol

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sure, but three is also many times less than the legal dose, which is something like 150-200mg/kg of body mass (Wikipedia article). According to Panera, their lemonades have ~150mg caffeine. Again from Wikipedia:

        [Caffeine overdose] typically occurs only after ingestion of large amounts of caffeine, well over the amounts found in typical caffeinated beverages and caffeine tablets (e.g., more than 400–500 mg at a time).

        So 3 of these drinks is right in that range of the upper limit of what’s reasonable, and each is about the amount in a typical energy drink (Red bull has 80mg/can, Monster has about 160mg/can). That doesn’t sound excessive to me. Sure, three is a lot, but that’s still not enough to cause problems unless you already have significant health risks. So as long as they have signage saying how much caffeine it has in a way customers can visualize, I honestly think that’s fine.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A large lemonade contains up to 390 mg of caffeine. That’s more than two Monsters.

          Three lemonades is a six pack of Monster in one sitting. That’s 1080 mg. What am I not seeing here? That sure seems lethal to me!

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Let’s assume the person is 50kg (low estimate), a lethal dose is 150mg * 50 per day, or 7500mg. Three lemonades is merely 2x the point where caffeine intoxication starts, so I’d expect the following symptoms:

            According to the DSM-5, caffeine intoxication may be diagnosed if five (or more) of the following symptoms develop after recent consumption of caffeine: restlessness, nervousness, excitement, insomnia, flushed face, diuresis, gastrointestinal disturbance, muscle twitching, rambling flow of thought and speech, tachycardia or cardiac arrhythmia, periods of inexhaustibility, and psychomotor agitation.

            And at very high levels of consumption (about 5x of those three lemonades):

            According to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), cases of very high caffeine intake (e.g. > 5 g) may result in caffeine intoxication with symptoms including mania, depression, lapses in judgment, disorientation, disinhibition, delusions, hallucinations or psychosis, and rhabdomyolysis.

            None of those are life threatening, unless you have an underlying medical condition that makes you especially sensitive to caffeine. So three large lemonades would give you moderate symptoms, and those would likely go away within hours. The person in the article didn’t die from caffeine overdose, they died from a heart attack, meaning they likely had significant health issues where the high caffeine load pushed their heart too far. If you’ll notice, heart attack isn’t one of the symptoms at all, even with a much higher caffeine load.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Huh, I guess he didn’t have enough to hallucinate! Still enough to experience hearth arrhythmia, though, which can be dangerous (and was fatal in this case)

              I gotta be honest, I think he’s stupid for doing this to himself.

              I just don’t believe stupid people deserve to die.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Nor do I, but I also don’t think we should restrict everyone just because of some stupid people. As the saying goes:

                If you make something idiot-proof, someone will just make a better idiot.

                Put up sufficient warnings, perhaps warn them verbally before purchase, and then let people do what they want, provided it won’t hurt anyone but themselves. Obviously there should be exceptions for when someone is impaired (e.g. a bar), but if they seem to be of sound mind, let adults make their own stupid decisions.

                I don’t expect a cashier to know that someone could die when purchasing their product, nor do I think the business is obligated to do anything more than warn when it comes to relatively harmless products like caffeinated beverages.