• NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    On the same note of blame the lawmakers

    There’s a lot of hate about Teslas cars not reaching EPA estimates on highways.

    The EPA test is the problem. The test doesn’t include real world driving such as at 70mph and for whatever reasons, a Tesla often takes a bigger hit at 70mph than some other cars.

    I don’t doubt Tesla did some ratio optimization on the motors to get better EPA numbers, that’s just playing the game, but please lobby the EPA to change the testing methodology.

    Tests need to better include faster driving. Manufacturers should be required to show both numbers not a combined number in their advertising materials, and they really need to add some sort of cold weather test.

    Edit: also the whole 2 different test cycles they can choose between is ridiculous. Make it all the same.

    • nxdefiant@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This infuriates me to no end. The EPA could just mandate multiple numbers!

      I want a graph of the car going every speed between 55, 65, 75, and 85 on a treadmill at 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100°F while maintaining a cabin temp of 72°F.

      I want to know how much battery it used at those temps, simulating catching every red light in a downtown setting, in an hour.

      I want discharge rates for all those temps with it just sitting there for a week, same for a month.

      “Combined blah” is horseshit.