• Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      5·
      1 year ago

      Look, I think it’d be better without the cheating bit. I’ll give you that it’s definitely a weird inclusion. Pretty sure I already said as much to someone else, if not directly to you. The rest of it, though? There’s a lot of nit picking and stretching to make it at all misogynistic or incel related.

      As for imagery, I think we’re interpreting different things from the symbols. The broken heart and the frown represents not being in a relationship, despite being in love. The sunglasses aren’t supposed to represent coolness, but sneaking around, being ‘shady’. Overall could it be more clear? Sure. Could it just remove cheating and be a lot more agreeable? Sure. But with just a bit of contemplation it’s really not saying anything unreasonable.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          5·
          1 year ago

          I’m not trying that hard lmao. It’s just not as cut and dry as you seem to think it is. The symbolism used has a few interpretations.

          I’m also not trying that hard, because I’ve already admitted multiple times that I think it’d be a better comic without the cheating bit.

          The only thing I’m defending, or I suppose attacking, is the notion that it’s somehow misogynistic and incel-y.

    • L/nerd
      3·
      1 year ago

      me when media literacy is hard. :^(

      seriously, the last thing - relationship anarchy, is very rarely (if ever) supported by incels/misogynists in general, because they want control over women. relationship anarchy is very much not about control. if we’re to say that the imagery is indicating which is better, it probably would indicate relationship anarchy is best - given the whole everyone is smiling and look at all those hearts deal. not to mention, as the other commenter said - the shades indicate shadiness. there is a distinct air of it being bad in the long run to both scenarios in which secrets are actively being kept.