• SkyNTP@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used to be html and css-first, and to some degree I still am, but the advantages of SPA, lazy load, hot reload, and automatic state management and Dom rendering of a JS based framework are just too awesome to forego for the sake of staying native.

    I know about HTMX but it’s not really JS-less. It just creates the illusion that no JS is written. It still gets implemented in the browser with JS.

      • silas@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you have to manually approve every single script, even if it’s from the same origin as the site you’re visiting?

        • neosheo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Idk about librefox but with noscript you manually approve ALL scripts even same origin. However you dont need to do a temporary trust for them all. For sites you trust and frequent you can just trust them so it allows them to run everytime

          • I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It also comes default with the google ajax server always trusted, and the google analytics server untrusted.

            I’m trying to shop on Luxe Bidet, and it’s trying to load 26 different scripts. Everything that the scripts are doing, should be done in HTML/CSS instead as the article suggests. Going to a different page shouldn’t be an onClick event, it should be an HTML link. Loading images shouldn’t break with JS disabled, it should be an HTML image element.

            I get that JS has it’s place, but if I can’t even navigate your site without testing 26 different scripts to see which one is breaking the site, I’m going to a different site.