Stolen from Deltachat

  • parascent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sorry but as a Linux user I found that Windows is better than macos. Macos doesn’t even have proper window management.

      • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, but none of the system tools and applications follow Unix-like paradigms, so it’s really only Unix-like in name. Sure you can launch a bash or zsh shell, but there aren’t a lot of useful things you can do with that without installing a bunch of third party tools like brew, so the experience isn’t all that different from having to install Cygwin or WSL in Windows.

          • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Eh, WTF? It has normal Unix-like userland tools.

            You don’t understand what I mean.

            I mean that you can’t really do much with those userland tools to effectively manage and configure your system. All configuration is abstracted away in a forest of xml files (i.e. /Library/Preferences) that’s as opaque and undocumented as the Windows registry and which you’re not supposed to touch other than with the approved GUI tools.

            MacOS applications never follow Unix principles either regarding file placement.

            So yeah while MacOS technically still is “Unix”, it really is a giant monolithic blob of shite built on top of the skeleton of what once was a decent Unix.

    • mac@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Arguably Arch Linux also lacks proper Window management. The idea of macOS is to give you a solid base which is stable, functional and looks good. Then you can add your own window management type on top whether you want a Windows style one like magnet or a tiling one like amethyst.