… if you know how to use virtual desktops and shortcuts. You can’t look at two screens at a time, anyways.

One use case I can understand is having a 2nd monitor for checking stock prices or checking for a certain event. Other than that, I don’t see how it contributes to “productivity” while working or coding for example.

P.S: Tiling WM users may understand this post more

  • Hangglide@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Should I upvote because it is an unpopular opinion or down vote because he is wrong? I know it’s the former but I really don’t want to!

  • ShunkW@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol an actual unpopular opinion. I use 4 monitors. Sometimes I’m looking at reference documents on a second monitor to determine how to implement the function. Sometimes I have my dbms app up on the third screen so I can look at the data structure as I’m implementing it. And the 4th monitor is usually for YouTube so I have a background noise/video to keep me focused

  • DrMango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Funny how you seem to believe that “checking stock prices” is a good use of a whole monitor but don’t seem to see how literally any other task could benefit from having reference material up on a second monitor.

    • metarmask@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think they mean anything where changes happen without your input, because you might see it in your corner of your eye, whereas reference material can be switched to almost as fast as you can look to the side. Typing as you’re reading though…

  • PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine you have to cross examine 3 papers on your computer, you have to take notes and you have to input information on an excel document for your research paper thats on another word document. Try doing this on 1 screen.

  • macrocephalic@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because lots of productivity tasks, including coding, involve looking at a reference material while creating the output. I’m frequently looking at a database structure on one window, an API document on another, and coding in an IDE.

    You don’t necessarily need two screens, but it helps to have enough real estate to view two or more applications at once. Personally I use a 50" 4k TV and tile things in halves or quarters - which is the equivalent of having four 1080 monitors.

  • sigmatankworld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone who has 4 screens at work and 3 at home, you’ve done a great job picking a truly unpopular opinion, as I had a gutteral negative reaction when I saw this.

  • Another Catgirl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use two screens because it’s faster to turn my head between displays than it is to switch between virtual desktops. Also, some of my apps only run full-screen on the primary display, which breaks several window managers (but not KDE Plasma!)

  • waterbogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have two 40 in 4K monitors and a little 28 in 2K, my job involves network monitoring and diagnostics. No way could I work efficiently on just one screen unless it was ginormously bigly huge. I actually wouldnt mind another 4K but work machine hasnt the outputs

  • bloopernova@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have 3 27" 4k screens in this layout: | - -. That’s from left to right, portrait landscape landscape.

    I have a terminal and sometimes on the 1st screen. Code/Work on the second. Documentation/chats/email on the 3rd.

    It works well for me :)

    • emanon458@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah! How am I going to watch my favorite YouTubers while I play games?

      And then have to rewind it because actually trying to pay attention to 2 simulating things at once is hard for me.

  • vimzim@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It kinda makes me disturbed to have something bright in the corner of my eye when I concentrate to read text. And even though I use tiling WM, most of the time I only have one window at once, rarely two windows split horizontally, but no more.

  • devious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can’t look at two screens at a time, anyways.

    Unless you are sitting right in front of a single 50inch+ screen, your field of view can definitely accommodate more than one screen!

  • nyternic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Once I went double monitor, I can’t see myself falling back to a single monitor. I’ve used a single monitor for a good decade and a half before toying with double monitors. I just like being able to have things on one monitor and other things on another. It doesn’t necessarily have to be a programmer-specific thing. I now reflect back and hated the idea of having to manage and check so many things while under one monitor. Things would be blinking, but oh wait, I’m gaming, oh wait, I’m browsing too and it’s just too much.