0x4E4F@infosec.pub to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoSteve Balmer quotesinfosec.pubimagemessage-square241fedilinkarrow-up11.39K
arrow-up11.39KimageSteve Balmer quotesinfosec.pub0x4E4F@infosec.pub to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square241fedilink
minus-squareThePhantomGM@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up99·1 year agoAllow all code merges automatically
minus-squareoce 🐆@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up27·1 year agoAnarchy is not absence of rules, it’s absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.
minus-squaremcmoor@bookwormstory.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoBut then one person disagree with those rules and we’re back to no rules
minus-squareoce 🐆@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoIs it not possible for the people to all agree to respect the result of the majority vote even if they voted against the motion?
Allow all code merges automatically
Anarchy is not absence of rules, it’s absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.
Basicaly democracy on steroids
So we could use a blockchain… (/s)
But then one person disagree with those rules and we’re back to no rules
You can have a majority vote system.
Removed by mod
Is it not possible for the people to all agree to respect the result of the majority vote even if they voted against the motion?
Removed by mod
An initial one.
Removed by mod