YouTube’s Loaded With EV Disinformation::When it comes to articles on a website like CleanTechnica, there are two kinds of articles. First, there are the … [continued]

  • limelight79@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have already addressed that point twice. Why do you keep ignoring it? Some improvements are good.

    I understand the game can be played only while parked. But guess what? That software is in the car all the time. It’s another place there could be a bug that allows access to vital systems. It’s another place where there could be some weird interaction with other systems in unintended ways.

    I don’t understand why you keep ignoring that point. A software developer should understand the issue better than most people. I’ve given example after example of why we should be careful about what we put in cars and weigh the benefits against the risks. You refuse to acknowledge that there might even be an issue.

    I can only hope when this shit fails, it doesn’t kill me.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand why you keep ignoring that point.

      Noticed you ignored my whole point of cars already being computerized for many years, and my question to you …

      Before you go, I’d love to hear your opinion on the last point I made, about cars already being computerized and having features for many years, that you would deem as being hazardous to have?


      I have already addressed that point twice. Why do you keep ignoring it? Some improvements are good.

      I understand the game can be played only while parked. But guess what? That software is in the car all the time. It’s another place there could be a bug that allows access to vital systems. It’s another place where there could be some weird interaction with other systems in unintended ways.

      I don’t understand why you keep ignoring that point. A software developer should understand the issue better than most people. I’ve given example after example of why we should be careful about what we put in cars and weigh the benefits against the risks. You refuse to acknowledge that there might even be an issue.

      I can only hope when this shit fails, it doesn’t kill me.

      • limelight79@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’ve got to be trolling. I’ll quote my comments about that, then I will block you. You continue to ignore the things I say and act like I haven’t responded several times. READ.

        Look, I’m not a luddite. I like having nav and satellite radio and all of that.

        The advantages of computer control are huge, we’re getting more mileage and more power out of smaller engines all the time. I’m not recommending we get rid of computers in cars.

        Some improvements are good.