• AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I could explain. I just don’t see you as being worth the bother. Your uninformed followup that features exactly no useful rejoinders or any conception of political philosophy confirms I made the correct decision to treat you like a stooge.

    I have engaged in no narratives, simply a correct understanding of the history and philosophy of the liberal movement.

    I highly doubt you know enough about liberalism to even say what the philosophy cares about at its core.

    I wish it surprised me that liberals don’t even know what liberalism is, but I’ve been involved in political debates for far too long.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      More vague accusations with no evidence or theses behind them.

      You are single-mindedly focused on exposing your own ignorance.

      By all means, take another swing.

      • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        oh dear god

        try not to hurt yourself thinking

        literally none of this is controversial to anyone with any sort of understanding of political philosophy. but go off

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As long as you can’t put forth a coherent thesis or even a clear opinion, you aren’t going to gain any ground.

            • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sounds about your speed: vague, easily diaprovsble claims, make up arguments for others because you can’t defend your own incorrect opinions or counter theirs, and then retreat.