• LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      1 year ago

      Depends on what the goal is. Heavy vehicles do disproportionately more damage to the infrastructure.

      They might want to encourage smaller, lighter cars, regardless of type. They certainly make small city EVs, as well as just encouraging walking, biking, public transportation, etc.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah but damage goes up exponentially with weight, so the problem is semi trucks, garbage trucks, buses, etc. Not cars.

        • tb_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except when the amount of cars is an order or two of magnitude greater than those other two, heavy cars do take their toll on the road surface

          • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It doesn’t work like that when you have exponential damage with weight. Cars use road capacity, but damage from cars just isn’t there. You get damage from seen semi trucks, freeze thaw cycles, etc.

            • tb_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So what? When there’s a lot more cars, especially within a city, and when those cars get a lot heavier, it will do a lot more damage.

              A semi isn’t going to drive over inner city roads, at least not regularly.

              • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                When damage goes up to the fourth power, cars are very, very minor. While EVs are a bit heavier, they are not that much heavier.

                Semi, garbage trucks, transit buses, yellow buses, moving trucks, etc are the ones that wear on roads and what roads are designed for.

                I’m amazed at the downvotes.

                • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  trucks don’t travel in certain areas in most cities so these vehicles can cause problems in hard to reach areas including inside parking structures. They also tend to limit visibility by being taller than an average person, which can make life more dangerous for pedestrians. There’s a lot of reasons to want to limit SUVs.

                • tb_@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  A small city car (Kia Picanto) weighs about 900 kg (~2000 pounds), a regular Ford Mustang weighs just under twice that, a Mustang Mach E weighs over twice that and then some.

                  Damage done will go up.

                  If you take into account the amount of people a bus transports, or the “useful work” a small semi and garbage trucks do, not even a small city car can win in terms of damage done– let alone a monster of a vehicle carrying one to two persons.

      • Alto@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure where you pulled 8000lbs from, even a fully speced out expedition isn’t going to be 6000lbs. Most non full sized ones, especially ones like the CRV or escape or something are under 4,000lbs. A model 3 weighs more than the majority of those smaller SUVs.

        Don’t try to take this as any sort of pro-suv or anti-ev message, quite the opposite. Spouting incorrect bullshit makes people less likely to believe the actual facts, such as the increase of SUVs and trucks quite literally killing us.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everything which is related to the common space should be charged or even limited by their impact in the common space.

    SUV’s are bigger so use more space, are almost twice as likely to kill a pedestrian in a collision than other cars, interfere with the ability of other road users to spot danger sooner (because people in normal cars behind a SUV often are in a position too low to see the road beyond the SUV through its windows) and because of being heavier and less aerodinamically efficient consume more hence polute more (even the electric ones indirectly polute more because not all electricity is generated from renewals).

    So it makes sense that SUVs get hit by significantly higher charges related to their impact in the common space or even limited in some places because they’re much more dangerous to pedestrians and negativelly impact the safety of other road users.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    PARIS, Nov 22 (Reuters) - Paris aims to drive large sports utility vehicles (SUVs) out of its centre by hiking parking fees for heavy cars in the French capital, and it plans a citizens’ vote on the proposal early next year.

    After banning rental scooters in September in the wake of a citizen’s vote, Paris will hold a local referendum on Feb. 4 about “the place of SUVs in the capital”.

    “We need to reduce the number and the size of cars in the city, that is why we will submit to a vote the question of how much space there should be for this type of vehicle in Paris,” Deputy Mayor David Belliard, an ecologist, told Reuters.

    Under Mayor Anne Hidalgo, Paris has for years raised pressure on drivers by increasing parking costs and gradually banning diesel vehicles, while boosting the bicycle lane network in the congested capital.

    In a few years, in a few months, they won’t be welcome in Paris with this type of behaviour," Belliard said.

    He said Paris also wanted car manufacturers to stop building this type of vehicle because they were too expensive, too polluting and unsuitable for cramped city centres.


    The original article contains 356 words, the summary contains 197 words. Saved 45%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good. Too bad it will never happen in the US. I’m sick and tired of these shitboxes that destroy visibility and kill people, always being operated by someone clueless (and usually single occupancy).

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I dont expect parking fees to affect people who already buyva car that is not economically viable. It hits where it does not hurt.

    • blubfisch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here’s the thing: people don’t make decision based on cost, but on what they feel what the cost is. For example: there are studies showing people underestimate the cost of car ownership by a factor of 2. They typically forget about the loss in value and the repair costs. Parking fees (if taken per occasion) are cost that people actually feel every day, making it more likely that they factor into their decision, maybe even more so than fuel costs.

  • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope they don’t come up with a superlight suv to defeat this. mostly because it would likely turn over easily.