• Primarily0617
    link
    fedilink
    1097 months ago

    “May help” reads as though they’re making it up on the spot

    “might clean your chimney or something idk lol”

    • @Tehgingey@lemmy.ca
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      “Idk lol” one of my favorite laissez faire responses of all time, especially after some heinous shirlt like burning batteries. “It hasn’t been reported to hurt anyone yet but idk lol”

      • @LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        327 months ago

        How would they have known, really? This was a real tip in the very early 1900s iirc, and back then everything gave you cancer or rotted one or more of your organs. We put asbestos, lead, and radium in literally everything.

        It’s kind of a wonder that within 100 years, we managed to identify what things caused which cancer. Like at the time, your jaw would start rotting off and, looking for a cause, you could gesture broadly at everything.

        • @Tehgingey@lemmy.ca
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          197 months ago

          No doubt, so much shit we have done has turned out later to be extremely detrimental to our health and environment. We just have done studies about gas appliances and found it has a noticeable effect on air quality and that’s a long time using it.

          I just think “idk lol” is hilarious. Kindof reminds me of the South Park BP “we’re sorry” as he’s naked on the polar bear rug.

          Corporate fucky wuckies are funny to laugh about as a PR response to me. “We did a whoopsie doodle were sowwy”

          • @LillyPip@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            87 months ago

            I just think “idk lol” is hilarious.

            Oh yeah, I totally agree. That was our whole philosophy for a while, coupled with a crow-like mentality of ‘shiny thing good!’

  • @Metatronz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    577 months ago

    I like to entertain the kids with a good old fashioned battery fire. Sometimes we breakout the mercury for a little hands on fun!

    • @Nawor3565
      link
      English
      527 months ago

      I can’t imagine that the relatively tiny amount of zinc in a flashlight battery would have any affect on the soot from a fireplace. As for the colors, it will totally do that, although you can also buy the little packs they make to throw in campfires if you want to avoid giving yourself cancer.

      • @nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        117 months ago

        The first flashlight batteries were entirely zinc casings because it was the negative electrode.

        They had a carbon rod (anode) and manganese oxide wrapper and were filled with ammonium chloride electrolyte.

        Burning the ammonium chloride might have been the most dangerous part, not sure if that could release chlorine gas or not, but probably not with most fires.

        Zinc fumes alone are pretty terrible to breath though. Welders can get sick for a couple days if they weld galvanized steel without cleaning it well. Supposedly drinking milk helps the symptoms, but I’ve avoided it so far.

      • Karlos_Cantana
        link
        fedilink
        107 months ago

        I can’t imagine that the relatively tiny amount of zinc in a flashlight battery would have any affect on the soot from a fireplace

        That’s why you would want to start by dumping a huge box of batteries in the fire.

      • @skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 months ago

        several grams isnt tiny amount. zinc is, like it or not, a toxic heavy metal, sure, not as toxic as cadmium or thallium, but it can and will fuck up several things if released

        and then you have batteries containing nickel, mercury, cadmium, lithium, lead,

        • @Nawor3565
          link
          English
          37 months ago

          Oh sure, I wasn’t implying it would be safe, just that a few grams of it isn’t gonna do jack shit to prevent soot buildup like the image implies.

      • @LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I don’t know much about batteries, but by a relatively tiny amount, are you talking about today’s batteries or those from 100+ years ago when this tip was published?

        Those would have been D batteries, most likely. I also don’t know how much zinc was in those, how much zinc is too much to burn, or if the composition of batteries was the same then as now. Rather curious about all this. Also I was taught batteries can explode in fire – was that a myth? Any battery experts in the chat?

        • @Nawor3565
          link
          English
          27 months ago

          As far as I can tell, the zinc itself wouldn’t be particularly harmful (at least, not moreso than inhaling any other metal vapors). The nasty stuff would be manganese dioxide, which is a main component in zinc-carbon, zinc-chloride, and alkaline batteries. Generally, non-rechargable batteries won’t “explode” in a fire, but they will puncture and leak chemicals everywhere, which isn’t great. Lithium batteries, on the other hand, will absolutely explode and should be kept far away from anything that could damage them.

    • @skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      now that i’m thinking about it: not zinc, but maybe manganese. if you add a little of ferrocene to diesel, it’ll burn (ie on a wick) without soot. ferrocene here works as a source of small amounts of very fine iron oxide particles, which catalyze burning of soot. manganese could work like this, but this works only if you provide enough air in the first place

      the fact that this also works for rocket fuels made ferrocene a highly watched substance in cold war (alternative is very fine iron oxide - but you need more of it. this is used in space shuttle solid fuel)