When I’m romanizing my conlangs, I tend to prefer using diacritics over digraphs—e.g., I’d rather write /ʃ/ as <š> than <sh>. It gets rid of any possible ambiguity, and makes things a consistent one letter per phoneme. What do you guys think?

  • Erika2rsis
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The conlang I’m working on has two romanization systems, one with diacritics and another with polygraphs. I find that I generally use the latter system nowadays, because of its ASCII-friendliness and the lack of a need to create a custom keyboard layout.

    • ThatOneKirbyMain2568@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Understandable. I’ve found that I can use IPA keyboards on my phone and computer to deal with any diacritic I need, so I’ve stuck to using those when I can.

  • GadolElohai@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I like chaotic orthographies (for conlangs only), so I prefer digraphs with a generous serving of historical orthography.